Laserfiche WebLink
San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department DIRECTOR <br /> Donna Heran, REHS <br /> 600 East Main Street <br /> Stockton, California 95202-3029 PROGRAM COORDINATORS <br /> } � Robert McClellon, REHS <br /> .•'' Jeff Carruesco, RENS, RDI <br /> Website: www.sjgov.org/ehd Kasey Fofey,REHS <br /> F o R Linda Turkatte, REHS <br /> Phone: (209) 468-3420 <br /> Fax: (209) 464-0138 <br /> August 17, 2011 <br /> Mr. R. Ellis, Jr. <br /> Ms. Ethyl D. Ellis, Trustee et glia <br /> 1991 West Lincoln Road <br /> Stockton, California 95207-2462 <br /> Subject: California Tank Lines, Inc. <br /> 3105 South EI Dorado Street <br /> Stockton, California 95206 <br /> Dear Mr. Ellis: <br /> The San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (EHD) has reviewed Corrective <br /> Action Plan Feasibility Study (CAPFS), dated June 2011, prepared by Taber Consultants <br /> (Taber), on your behalf for the above-referenced site. The CAPFS was submitted in response <br /> to the EHD letter dated 01 April 2011 directing that a revised corrective action plan (CAP) be <br /> submitted that included evaluation of several methods for site remediation, and directed that <br /> contaminant mass estimates, supported by calculations, for sorbed and dissolved total <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g), benzene, 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA), total <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPH-d), and total petroleum hydrocarbons as motor oil <br /> (TPH-mo) be included in the CAP as well as an analysis for cost-effectiveness for the <br /> recommended remedial technologies. <br /> In the CAPFS, Taber focuses on the two areas where petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations <br /> are significant: 1) near MW-2 where TPH-d and TPH-mo have been detected as free product, <br /> and 2) near MW-4 where TPH-g; benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes (BTEX); di- <br /> isopropyl ether (DIPE) and 1,2-DCA have been the predominant contaminants of concern. <br /> Although Taber does not provide contaminant mass estimates for sorbed constituents, Taber <br /> estimates that approximately 55 gallons of free product remain in the area of MW-2; and <br /> approximately 11.4 pounds of TPH-g, 55.1 pounds of TPH-d, 615.6 pounds of TPH-mo, 0.3 <br /> pounds of benzene and 0.5 pounds of 1,2-DCA remain in groundwater at this site. <br /> The source of the free product is inferred to have been an unauthorized release from two former <br /> waste oil underground storage tanks (USTs) removed from the site in 1990. The source of the <br /> petroleum hydrocarbon contamination in the area of MW-4 is unknown. Taber hypothesizes <br /> that the hydrocarbon contaminant source may be from an unreported surface spill or "possibly <br /> due to a documented groundwater plume emanating from the Pacific Pride facility to the south." <br /> Taber supports the second hypothesis with the following information: <br />