Laserfiche WebLink
7.4 Floating Oil <br /> • ` K A September 1998 sample of groundwater monitoring well MW-2 found black, floating oil that <br /> appeared to be typical of used motor oil Floating oil has been removed from MW-2, using <br /> disposable bailers and absorbent socks, periodically since that time Approximately 19 8 <br /> gallons of floating oil have been removed through 11/11/03 (Table 3) <br /> 7.5 Groundwater Flow <br /> The groundwater direction of flow for the area was inferred to be southeasterly at a gradient of <br /> I 0 00323 ft/ft(Figure 3) <br /> y <br /> Figure 4 shows groundwater elevations at various dates Elevations fluctuate over very <br /> significant ranges (up to 5 feet in 9 months), which will affect contamination levels, flow <br /> direction, gradient,etc <br /> A review of Figure 4, Groundwater Elevation, shows that wells MW-1, MW-3 and MW-4 <br /> kkw moved in tandem from April 2000 through September 2001, with MW-2 generally following <br /> the same trend, but, moving higher or lower somewhat randomly This is due to the difficulty <br />' of measuring groundwater elevations in MW-2 because of floating hydrocarbons in this well <br /> 8 0 Conclusions and Recommendations <br /> 8.1 Conclusions <br /> • The former waste oil USTs caused significant contamination of the soil and groundwater <br /> immediately adjacent to the tanks. Substantial quantities of oil have been removed from MW- <br /> 2, however, contamination remains The used oil appears to move very slowly through the soil <br /> and in relatively close proximity to the former USTs location The contamination does not <br /> appear in any of the other three wells - <br /> The former diesel USTs caused moderate contamination of the soil and groundwater adjacent to <br /> the tanks Diesel contamination was detected in MW-2 (northeast of MW-1) and MW-3 <br /> (southeast of MW-1) in April 2000"This was not evident in later samples until December 2001 <br /> - 4W-2) when contamination was detected again Since <br /> that time, the diesel contamination in MW-3 and MW-4 has disappeared The contamination in <br /> MW-2 remains although it is decreasing consistently The diesel contamination in MW-1 (site <br /> of the former diesel USTs) is ND The presence of diesel contamination in MW-2 indicates <br /> that diesel contamination is still affecting groundwater quality(Figure 5) <br /> MW-4 was installed down gradient (at that time) from MW-2 to detect possible movement of <br /> used motor oil in the groundwater from the contamination source (former waste oil USTs at <br /> MW-2) No oil has been detected in the groundwater at MW-4, indicating that used oil <br /> contamination has not spread down gradient from MW-2 as far as MW-4 <br /> MW4 continues to show contamination from gasoline,oxygenates and BTEX <br /> Groundwater flow was south/southeast in December 2001, east in March 2002, north/northeast <br /> in June 2002, southeasterly in September 2002, easterly from MW-1 to MW-3, southerly from <br /> MW-2 to MW-3, southwesterly from MW-4 to MW-3 and now southeasterly This coupled <br /> . with a very low gradient, will likely result in contamination remaining in relatively close <br /> 7 / <br /> i <br /> f <br />