My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0009310
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
EL DORADO
>
3105
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0542208
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0009310
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2019 4:55:39 PM
Creation date
7/24/2019 4:41:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0009310
RECORD_ID
PR0542208
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0024243
FACILITY_NAME
CALIFORNIA TANK LINES
STREET_NUMBER
3105
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
EL DORADO
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
17512028
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
3105 S EL DORADO ST
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> southwesterly from MW-4 to MW-3 at a gradient of 0 01 ft/ft(Figure 3) <br /> • Figure 4 shows groundwater elevations at various dates Elevations fluctuate over very <br /> significant ranges (up to 5 feet in 9 months), which will affect contamination levels, flow <br /> direction, gradient, etc <br /> IA review of Figure 4, Groundwater Elevation, shows that wells MW-1, MW-3 and MW-4 <br /> moved in tandem from April 2000 through September 2001, with MW-2 generally following the <br /> Isame trend, but, moving higher or lower somewhat randomly This is due to the difficulty of <br /> measuring groundwater elevations in MW-2 because of floating hydrocarbons in this well <br /> MW-3 elevations differed from MW-1 in December 1999 and again in February 2003 The <br /> significance of this is unclear at this time <br /> 50 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> 5.9 Conclusions <br /> IThe former waste oil USTs caused significant contamination of the soil and groundwater <br /> • immediately adjacent to the tanks Substantial quantities of oil have been removed from MW-2, <br /> however, contamination remains The used oil appears to move very slowly through the soil and <br /> in relatively close proximity to the former USTs location The contamination does not appear in <br /> any of the other three wells <br /> The former diesel USTs caused moderate contamination of the soil and groundwater adjacent to <br /> the tanks Diesel contamination was detected in MW-2 (northeast of MW-1) and MW-3 <br /> I (southeast of MW-1) in April 2000 1 UJY- <br /> coritammuon-was=-detected-again Since <br /> that time, the diesel contamination in MW-3 and MW-4 has disappeared The contamination in <br /> MW-2 remains although it is consistently decreasing The diesel contamination in MW-1 (site of <br /> Ithe former diesel USTs) remains The presence in MW-1 and MW-2 indicates that diesel <br /> contamination is still affecting groundwater quality (Figure 5) <br /> MW-4 was installed down gradient (at that time) from MW-2 to detect possible movement of <br /> Iused motor oil in the groundwater from the contamination source (former waste oil USTs at <br /> I <br /> Environeenng,Inc - Project No 03 00218 Page 6 <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.