Laserfiche WebLink
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
i <br /> 4.4 Floating Oil <br /> iA September 1998 sample of groundwater monitoring well MW-2 found black, floating ail that <br /> iappeared to be typical of used motor oil Floating oil has been removed from MW-2, using <br /> disposable bailers, periodically Approximately 13 4 gallons of floating oil have been removed <br /> ithrough 19 September 2001 <br />' 4.5 Groundwater Flow <br /> The groundwater direction of flow for the area bound by MW-1, MW-2 and MW-4 was inferred <br /> ito be toward the southeast at a gradient of 0 0079 ft/ft (Figure 3), groundwater direction of flow <br /> in the area bound by MW-1, MW-3 and MW-4 was inferred to be curving toward the east a <br /> igradient of 0 0101 ft/ft <br /> The flow gradient increased from the previous quarter <br /> i <br /> Figure 4 shows groundwater elevations at various dates Elevations fluctuate over very <br /> Isignificant ranges (up to 5 feet in 9 months), which will affect contamination levels, flow <br /> direction, etc <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> 5.1 Conclusions <br /> The former waste oil USTs caused significant contamination of the soil and groundwater <br /> immediately adjacent to the tanks Substantial quantities of oil have been removed from MW-2, <br /> however, some contamination remains (as evidenced by the amount of floating oil removed <br /> during the quarter) The used oil appears to move very slowly through the soil, so that the area <br /> of contamination appears to be in relatively close proximity to the former USTs location <br /> The former diesel USTs caused moderate contamination of the soil and groundwater adjacent to <br />' the tanks Diesel contamination was detected in MW-2 (northeast of MW-1) and MW-3 <br /> (southeast of MW-1) in April 2000 This was not evident in later samples Diesel contamination <br /> was detected in MW-1 and in MW-4 in the samples taken in September 2001, indicating that <br /> diesel contamination still poses a threat to groundwater quality (Figure 5) <br /> Environeenng,Inc Project No 01-009 012 Page 5 <br /> I <br />