Laserfiche WebLink
Table 3. Soil Sample Results from Report of Investigation Dated 3 February 2000 <br /> Sam le ID TPH- TFH- Motor Z z i Ethyl Total <br /> p Gasoline; Diesel' Oils' MTBE Benzene Toluene <br /> Benzene2 Xylenes <br />. <br /> 13-5-30 ND 450 ND ND ND ND ND ND <br />. B-5-35 ND s0 ND ND ND ND ND ND <br /> B-5-45 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND <br />. B-5-50 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND <br /> MW-1-20 ND 2300 ND ND ND ND 026 0.33 <br /> MW-1-30 ND 2230 ND ND ND ND 0.11 0.175 <br />. MW-1-35 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND <br />. MW-1-50 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND <br /> MW-3-15 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND <br /> MW-3-30 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND <br /> MW-3-35 ND ND ND ND ND 0.007 ND 0.0076 <br /> MW-3-50 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND <br /> Notes <br /> Results are given in ppm <br /> 'Detection linuts for analyses on this sample were 1 ppm <br /> rZDetection limits for analyses on this sample were 0 005 ppm <br /> ND=Not detected at or above the indicated laboratory detection limit <br /> While not completed as part of the current investigation, the following table from the report <br /> r prepared in 1997 by Sierra Pacific following removal of two (2) used oil USTs in 1990, is <br /> r included here to provide more complete data regarding the extent of contamination of the site <br /> r <br /> r The data indicate soil contamination from both gasoline and oil, generally confined to an area <br /> i adjacent to the former USTs The two (2) USTs would appear to be the source of contamination <br /> r <br /> r <br /> r <br /> r <br /> r <br /> i <br /> i <br /> r <br /> r <br /> i <br /> Environeenng,Inc Project No 00-01108 10 <br />