Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> # MW-2) No oil has been detected in the groundwater at MW-4, indicating that used oil <br /> contamination has not spread down gradient from MW-2 as far as MW-4 <br /> Groundwater from MW-4 continued to show contamination from TPH-gasoline, oxygenates <br /> z (except MTBE)and BETX The TPH-gasolme contamination continues to decrease throughout <br /> x <br /> the years The source of the gasoline contamination remains unknown at this time Figure 10 I <br /> shows how the groundwater elevation affects the TPH-gasoline concentration As the <br /> groundwater elevations rise,the contamination levels also rise rt 0' A :4l�1� ` <br /> F <br /> MW-4 has remained free from TPH-diesel contamination since June 2002 i <br /> � 6 1.2 WASTE OIL LISTS � <br /> E <br /> The former waste oil USTs caused significant contamination of the soil and groundwater <br /> ,f immediately adjacent to the tanks Substantial quantities of oil have been removed from MW- <br /> 2, however, contamination remains The used oil appears to move very slowly through the soil <br /> and in relatively close proximity to the former USTs location <br /> Analysis of MW-2 sampled on 12/17/04 continued to show contamination from TPH-diesel, i <br /> and TPH-motor oils BTEX reappeared at concentrations lower than previous quarters MW-2 <br /> showed contamination from motor oils as reflected in the amount of floating oil removed during <br /> the past quarter and the analytical results The level of oil contamination has dropped <br /> continuously from 2001 MW-1, MW-3 and MW4 continue to remain free of motor oils <br /> contamination, indicating that they have not been affected by contamination from the former <br /> used oil USTs <br /> 6.1 3 DIESEL USTs <br /> � • MW-1 (site of the former diesel USTs) continues to 1how contamination from diesel The <br /> TPH-diesel contamination level, as shown in Figure �, dropped below the reporting limit in <br /> June 2001, peeked at 72000 ppb in June 2002, decreased through Sept 2003, increased in <br /> March 2004,and decreased by one-half this quarter <br /> The former diesel USTs caused moderate contamination of the soil and groundwater adjacent to <br /> the tanks Diesel contamination was detected in MW-2 (northeast of MW-1) and MW-3 <br /> (southeast of MW-1) in April 2000 This was not evident in later samples until December 2001 <br /> (MW-1, MW-2 and MW4)and March 2001 (MW-3) when contamination was detected again <br /> Since that time, the diesel contamination In MW-3 and MW-4 has disappeared The <br /> ` contamination in MW-2 remains although it is decreasing overall The presence of diesel <br /> contamination in MW-2 indicates that diesel contamination is still affecting groundwater <br /> quality(Figure 6) <br /> The reversal of trends over the past 3 years may have resulted from the extreme changes in <br /> groundwater elevation,this is Illustrated in Figure 9 <br /> . 6.2 Data Anomalies <br /> 1 <br /> No data anomalies were found during this quarter's sampling <br /> i <br /> 40 <br /> ■ <br /> ■ <br />