Laserfiche WebLink
i 1 <br /> ' 10 August 2005 <br /> • AGE-NC Project No. 97-0301 <br /> Page 3 of 6 <br /> • Benzene,toluene,ethylbenzene,and xylenes(BTEX),methyl tertiary-butyl ether(MTBE), <br /> ' 1,2-Dichloroethane(1,2-DCA),ethylene dibromide(EBD),di-isopropyl ether(DIPE),ethyl <br /> tert-butyl ether(ETBE),tert-amyl methyl ether(TAME),and tertiary butanol(TBA)by EPA <br /> ' Method 8260B. <br /> • I <br /> ' 3.0. FINDINGS <br /> Ground water elevation, flow direction, and gradient were determined from field data collected <br /> ' on 15 March 2005. The contaminant impact to ground water was quantified by the ground water <br /> samples collected on 15 March 2005. <br /> VIP 3_0� <br /> 3.1. GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND GRADIENT MW I8 <br /> The depth to ground water mea urem satAbe <br /> ells MW- through MW-12 varied between 30.82 feet <br /> (MW-9A)and 32. feet(MW2WO Pops ofthe well casings;ground water elevations were <br /> ' calculated to be between 18.47 feet (MW-lOA) and 19.91 feet (MW-11D) below mean sea level <br /> (MSL).The average ground water elevatiori at the site on 15 March 2005 was 19.24 feet below MSL. <br /> Generally, ground water elevation at the site increased an average 3.79 feet between the December <br /> ' 2004 and the March 2005ound water monitoring events. aG S <br /> �' iig <br /> Ground water elevation data collected on 15 March 2005 from wells NW-- (A-C), MW-9 (A-D), <br /> I and MW-12 (A-D) is depicted on cross section D-D' (Figure 3). By determining the difference <br /> between ground water elevations(dh)and dividing by the difference of the screen interval midpoints <br /> (dl), the vertical gradient between adjacent screen intervals was calculated. Generally, moderately <br /> ' steep to steep downward vertical gradients were observed between the Second, Third, and Fourth <br /> Water Zones;while near neutral vertical gradients were observed between the First Water Zone and <br /> the Second Water Zone in the southern portion of the site (Figure 3). <br /> 1 - through MW-12 were calculated b subtracting the <br /> The ground water elevations at wells MW 2 t g y g <br /> measured depth to ground water from the surveyed casing elevation.The March 2005 ground water <br /> elevation data collected from wells MW-2 through MW-7 were plotted for the First Water Zone <br /> (Figure 4) as defined in AGE's CPT Site Investigation - Third Quarter 2001 (dated 25 October <br /> 2001). Generally, the net ground water flow direction was•toward the northeast at an approximate <br /> ' hydraulic gradient of 0.003 foot/foot(ft/ft). <br /> Advanced GeeEnvironmental,Inc. <br /> i <br /> � 1 <br /> I <br />