Laserfiche WebLink
09 May 2005 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 97-0301 <br /> Page 6of610 � � <br /> I <br /> a quarterly to an annual program,AGE believes that continued quarterly ground water <br /> sampling from these wells at this stage of the investigation is not cost effective and will not <br /> provide enough useful information (wells located upgradient and cross gradient) to <br /> ' supplement the ongoing investigation Annual sampling events should be adequate to <br /> monitor ground water impact at these wells and should be re-evaluated on an annual basis <br /> • Elimination of TPH-d, TPH-k and TPH-mo from the site'sround water monitoring <br /> g g <br /> ' program W <br /> • No additional ground water monitoring wells/soil borings are warranted at this time and the <br /> existing monitoring well network may be sufficient to complete a site Corrective Action Plan <br /> (CAP) and/or Problem Assessment Report(PAR) <br />� i <br /> 6.0. LINIITATIONS <br /> Our professional services were performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by <br /> environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities The findings were based upon <br /> ' analytical results provided by an independent laboratory Evaluation ofthe hydrogeologic conditions <br /> at the site for the purpose of this investigation was made from review of previous consultants reports <br /> and a limited number of available data points(ground water data/samples)and subsurface conditions <br /> may vary away from these data points No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the <br /> professional interpretations, opinions, and recommendations contained in this report <br /> II <br /> 1 <br /> sS <br /> Advanced GeoEwnronmental,Inc <br /> i <br />