Laserfiche WebLink
01 April 2004 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 97-0301 <br /> ' Page 4 of 6 <br /> twenty-four water samples Various BTEX constituents ere detected In the same water samples <br /> ' (MW-1, MW-5 and MW-7) at concentrations as high as <br /> 600 µg11 xylene in the sample collected <br /> from MW-7 Benzene was detected from all three above referenced wells at concentrations of 150 <br /> ' µg11, 820 µg11 and 3,400 µg11, respectively I <br /> MTBE was detected in one water sample collected from well MW-1 at a concentration of 10 µg/1 <br /> ' (MW-8A) 1,2-DCA was detected in three (3) ground water samples collected from wells MW-1, y <br /> MW-5 and MW-7 at concentrations of 11 µg/1 , 290 µg/1 and 660 µg/1,respectively <br /> ' DIPE was detected for the first time in the sample collected from MW-5 at a concentration of 430 <br /> µg/1 No other fuel components were detected in the ground water samples Previous and current <br /> analytical results of ground water monitoring well samples are summarized in Tables 3 and 4 The <br /> tlaboratory reports (Cal Tech Environmental Laboratories Report I D No 0311-080)and chain-of- <br /> custody forms are presented in Appendix B <br /> ' 4.0. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> ' Due to a field technician over-sight, the California Tank Lines Inc wells MW-3 and MW-4 were <br /> monitored and sampled during the November 2003 monitoring event instead of the Pacific Pride- <br /> ' South E1 Dorado wells MW-3 and MW-4 AGE contacted Cal Tech Environmental Laboratories to <br /> omit the MW-3 and MW-4 results from the laboratory report <br /> ' The implications from the November 2003 ground water monitoring event are as follows <br /> • Generally, depth to ground water at the site vaned between 34 and 35%2 fee bsg, ground <br /> ' <br /> water elevations ranged between 21 68 feet(MW-8A)and 22 8 feet(MW-1210 below mean <br /> sea level � <br /> • Grouno water flow direction for the area bound by First Water Zone wells MW-1,MW-2 and <br /> MW h h MW-4was inferred to be east-northeast at an approximate gradient of 0 002 <br /> ' fl/ft or less (Figure 4) Due to the low gradient at the site, slight variations in ground water <br /> measurements or changes of recharge/discharge of the local ground water could greatly <br /> ' modify ground water flow direction <br /> • Ground water elevation generally decreased at the site an average 0 26 feet between the <br /> t September 2003 and the November 2003 ground water monitoring events The decrease in <br /> ground water elevation is probably due to seasonal fluctuation <br /> • Generally, a steep downward vertical gradient was observed from wells MW-8,MW-9 and <br /> ' MW-12 and between the First Water Zone and the Fourth Water Zone (Figure 3) <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br /> t <br />