My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0009133
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
EL DORADO
>
3147
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544705
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0009133
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2019 11:12:08 AM
Creation date
7/29/2019 10:51:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0009133
RECORD_ID
PR0544705
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0003754
FACILITY_NAME
CALIFORNIA FUELS
STREET_NUMBER
3147
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
EL DORADO
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
17512003
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
3147 S EL DORADO ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' 04 November 2002 <br /> iAGE-NC Project No 97-0301 <br /> ' Page 2 of 5 <br /> 2 2 GROUND WATER SAMPLING <br /> Following well purging, ground water levels at all wells achieved a minimum of 80 percent recharge <br /> ' prior to sample collection Ground water samples were collected from the purged wells utilizing new, <br /> disposable polyethylene bailers and transferred into 1-liter amber bottles without sample preservative <br /> and 40-m1 EPA-approved VOA vials containing 0 5 ml 18%hydrochlonc acid as a sample preservative <br /> ' Care was taken to ensure that visible air bubbles were not present in the vials after filling and capping <br /> Ground water sample containers were labeled with the well designation, date, time, and sampler's <br /> initials <br /> 2 3 LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> ' Following collection and labeling, each ground water sample was logged on a chain-of-custody form, <br /> placed in a chilled container and transported to a California Department of Health Services (DHS)- <br /> certified laboratory for analysis for <br /> ie • Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline, diesel,kerosene and motor oil (TPH-g, <br /> TPH-d, TPH-k and TPH-mo respectively)by EPA Methods 8015M/5030/3510, <br /> • Benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene and xylene (BTEX) and methyl tertiary-butyl ether(MTBE) <br /> ' by EPA Method 8020, and <br /> • Methanol, ethanol, 1,2-Dichloroethane (1,2-DCA), ethylene dibromide (EBD), di-isopropyl <br /> ' ether (DIPE), ethyl tert butyl ether (ETBE), MTBE, tert amyl methyl ether(TAME), tertiary <br /> butanol (TBA)by EPA Method 8260M <br /> 1 <br /> 3.0. FINDINGS <br /> ' Ground water elevation, flow direction and gradient were determined from field data collected <br /> on 03 June 2002, the contaminant impact to ground water was quantified by the ground water <br /> laboratory data <br /> 3 1 GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND GRADIENT <br /> The depths to ground water in wells MW-1 through MW-7 were measured at between 28 99 and <br /> ' 29 70 feet below the tops of well casings,ground water elevations were calculated to be between 16 65 <br /> feet(MW-2 and MW-6) and 16 85 feet(MW-5)below mean sea level Ground water elevation at the <br /> . site decreased an average 0 30 feet between the March 2002 and the June 2002 ground water monitoring <br /> ' Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br /> I' 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.