Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> 23 April 2001 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 97-0301 <br /> Page 3 of 5 <br /> 3.0. FINDINGS <br /> ' Ground water elevation, flow direction and gradient were determined from field data collected on <br /> 30 March 2001, the contaminant Impact to ground water was assessed from the ground water <br /> ' laboratory data <br /> ' 3 1 RELATIVE GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND GRADIENT <br /> The depths to ground water in wells MW-1 through MW-7 were measured between 26 80 and 27 46 <br /> ' feet below the tops of well casings,ground water elevations were calculated to be between 14 44 feet <br /> and 14 73 feet below mean sea level Ground water elevation at the site increased an average 2 10 <br /> feet between the December 2000 and the March 2001 ground water monitoring events, increasing <br /> 1 ground water elevation has been observed at the site at least since the September 2000 ground water <br /> monitoring event The ground water elevation data for MW-1 through MW-7 during the March 2001 <br /> ground water monitoring event is depicted in Figure 3 Ground water flow direction for the area <br /> ' bound by wells MW-1 through MW-6 was inferred east-southeast at a gradient of 0 003 ft/ft, or <br /> approximately 16 feet per mile(Figure 3),ground water flow direction in the area of well MW-7 was <br /> inferred to be toward the north at an undetermined gradient <br /> 3 2 LABORATORY RESULTS OF MONITORING WELL GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> A total of seven ground water samples were submitted to a DHS-certified laboratory in March 2001 <br /> TPH-g was detected in water samples collected from wells MW-1 and MW-7 at concentrations of <br /> 21,000 and 61,000 micrograms per liter (µg11), respectively, however the laboratory reported the <br /> samples from MW-1 and MW-7 as having significant unmodified or weakly modified gasoline <br /> ' TPH-d was detected in the water samples collected from MW-1,MW-2,MW-4,MW-5, and MW-7 <br /> at concentrations as high as 5,500µg11(MW-7), however the laboratory reported the samples from <br /> MW-1 and MW-7 as having significant gasoline range compounds, the samples from MW;2 and <br /> MW-4 as having no recognizable diesel pattern and the samples from MW-4 and MW-5 as having <br /> significant oil range compounds TPH-mo was detected in the water samples collected from MW-4, <br /> and MW-5 at concentrations of 270 and 710 ug/l, respectively <br /> ' BTEX compounds were detected in water samples collected from wells MW-1 MW-4 and MW-7 <br /> p p , <br /> at concentrations ranging as high as 11,000µg/l (MW-7, benzene) <br /> ' - 1 and 890 1 <br /> 1,2-DCA was detected in samples collected from MW-1 and MW 7 at 80 µgl , <br /> respectively, EDB was detected in the water sample collected from MW-I at a concentration of 7 <br /> µg/1 Fuel oxygenated compounds were not detected during the March 2001 laboratory analysis <br /> Analytical results of the ground water samples are summarized in Tables 2 and 3 The laboratory <br /> 1 Advanced CcoEnvironmentai,Inc <br /> I <br /> 1 <br /> I <br />