Laserfiche WebLink
eto 37 feet in July of 1993, fell to 40 feet in October of 1993, rose to 37 feet in May 1994 and <br /> • dropped to 41 feet in September 1994. These fluctuations are due to seasonal effects and <br /> are common in San Joaquin County. <br /> The group gradient radient at the site has varied from northwest in November of 1992 to <br /> northeast in February of 1994. <br /> 2.5.2 Petroleum Hydrocarbon Impacted Groundwater <br /> ' TPH as gasoline and diesel were detected in the initial sample collected from MW-1 in June <br /> of 1992 (260 ppb and 310 ppb, respectively). TPH as gasoline and diesel were detected in <br /> MW-1 during the May 1994 monitoring event at concentrations of 100 ppb and 58 ppb, <br /> ' respectively. TPH as gasoline was detected in MW-1 at a concentration of 170 ppb during <br /> the September 1994 monitoring event. No TPH as diesel was detected during the September <br /> 1994 monitoring. <br /> Low concentrations of benzene have been detected in samples from MW-1 and MW-4. <br /> ' Toluene was detected in the initial sample from MW-1, the September 1994 sample from <br /> MW-4 and the May and September 1994 samples from MW-5. No contamination has been' <br /> detected in samples from MW-2 or MW-3. Analytical results of groundwater samples are <br /> summarized in Table 2. <br /> 2.6 Soil Boring Installation <br /> Low residual concentrations of toluene and leve were detected in three soil samples <br /> Lo r xylene <br /> collected from MW-1 in 1992. An assessment of the remaining impacted soil was <br /> ' subsequently required by the PHS/EHD. On July 13, 1994, one soil boring was drilled <br /> approximately 7 feet north of monitoring well MW-1 and advanced to a depth of 45 feet. <br /> Three samples, from depths of 35, 40 and 45 feet, were analyzed for TPH as gasoline and <br /> ' diesel and BTE&X. No petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in any of these samples. <br /> Therefore, it is likely that petroleum hydrocarbons detected in samples from MW-1 in 1992 <br /> are no longer present at the site or of very limited extent, and do not pose a significant risk <br /> to groundwater. <br /> 3.0 PROCEDURES <br /> ' 3.1 Limited Groundwater Extraction <br /> On December 7, 1994, the groundwater depth was measured in each monitoring well relative <br /> to the top of the casing using a Solinst water level meter (Table 1). An extended purge was <br /> then performed on MW-1 in an attempt to remove impacted groundwater at the site. A <br /> submersible pump was used to purge MW-1. Approximately 400 gallons of water were <br /> removed in 4.5 hours. Purge water was stored on-site in an above-ground 'Baker" tank. <br /> Q.obpn3 Au&Servwn,[.c. C <br /> We.eem C.ih QR6n7-9v1,10 J <br /> I <br />