Laserfiche WebLink
' Bank of Stockton Page 11 <br /> BofS (Cuter) Preliminary Soil and Groundwater Investigation <br /> Project No 102 2 <br /> April 8, 1997 <br /> 4.0 DISCUSSION <br /> The laboratory analytical results from this investigation appear to confirm the conclusion of <br /> the earlier Geological Technics investigation that the area just north of the former "Oil <br /> Supply" building is near the locus of a gasoline UST release and a much smaller diesel <br /> release <br /> As shown in Figure 3, the contaminant plume in the vadose zone forms the approximate <br /> shape of an elliptical cone At the point where the cone intersects the saturated zone (+ 35ft), <br /> it has lateral dimensions of about 60 by 90 feet From the flanks the cone rises to its apex as <br /> little as 2 feet beneath the surface (beneath the former dispenser island) <br /> At the 35 foot level the area of the cone is about 4,300 square feet A rough estimate was <br /> made of the volume of gasoline impacted soil in the vadose zone using two methods The <br /> volume of a cone is given by the equation "v = nr2h/3" where r is the radius of the base of the <br /> cone, h is the height of the cone, and v is the volume The total area of the base of the cone <br /> can be approximated by a circle with a radius of 37 feet Using 35 feet for the height results <br /> in a volume of 50,177 cubic feet An alternate method involves estimated the area of the <br /> vadose zone plume at different depths and then calculating the volume of successive slices of <br /> the plume By adding the volume of each such slice, a total estimated volume of about 52,000 <br /> cubic feet was calculated These methods of estimating the volume of vadose zone soil <br /> impacted by petroleum hydrocarbons does not take into consideration the material that may <br /> be affected in the saturated zone <br /> The areal extent of the diesel impacted soil appears to be smaller at depth than at the 10 foot <br /> level Moreover, at the level of the top of the saturated zone, diesel fuel was detected in soil <br /> and / or groundwater samples in only two of the nine bonngs while gasoline was detected in <br /> all 9 bonngs The distnbution and concentration of gasoline range hydrocarbons in <br /> comparison to the much smaller concentration and distribution of diesel range hydrocarbons <br /> leads to the strong suspicion that the diesel range hydrocarbons have impacted the <br /> groundwater only in a small area and only because the diesel was entrained by the gasoline <br /> and earned to groundwater by the much more mobile gasoline In any case, it is clear the <br /> diesel impact to soil and groundwater is a tiny fraction of the impact due to the gasoline <br /> release <br /> It is noteworthy that bonngs B-6, and B-7 are in nearly the same position as borings B-5 and <br /> B-2 from the earlier Geological Technics investigation The TPH-G levels found at the 10 <br /> foot level in B-5 and B-2 were 5,530 and 5,530 ppm respectively The comparable samples <br /> from this investigation yielded values of 5,130 and 212 ppm respectively Moreover, the <br /> sample 136-15 contained non-detectable levels of petroleum hydrocarbons even though a <br /> distinct gasoline odor was present It is not known why the TPH-G level in sample 136-10 is <br /> 2937 Veneman Ave,#13240 Geo-Phase Environmental Inc Phone (209) 569-0293 <br /> Modesto, CA 95356 Fax (209) 569-0293 <br />