Laserfiche WebLink
Bank of Stockton Page 2 <br /> Summer 1996 Quarterly Monitoring Report <br /> Project No 102 2 <br /> October 10, 1996 <br />' 1.2 Groundwater Sampling <br /> On September 3, 1996, depth to groundwater in three of the five monitoring wells was <br /> measured and one of the monitonng wells was purged and a groundwater sample was <br /> collected Mr Harlin Knoll of the San Joaquin County PHS/EHD which is the LOP <br /> agency, required that only the well MW-1 be purged and sampled Depth to groundwater <br /> in monitoring well MW-2 was not measured because a large number of wooden pallets <br /> were stacked on it, and monitoring well MW-3 was not measured because it was found to <br /> have been paved over with blacktop Wells MW-1, and MW-5 were also paved over, but <br /> the sampling technician was able to determine where they were and then chip the <br /> blacktop off the well boxes During the purging of MW-1, groundwater quality <br />' parameters were recorded are tabulated in the groundwater monitoring field notes <br /> (Appendix C) <br />' Due to unexpectedly high levels of BTEX compounds and gasoline range petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons in the sample collected from MW-1, the well was re-sampled on Septembet <br /> 16, 1996 <br />' 1.3 Groundwater Sampling Procedure <br /> p g e <br /> On September 3, 1996, Del-Tech Geotechnical Support arrived on-site, opened the wells <br /> MW-1, MW-4, and MW-5, and measured the depth to water with an electrically actuated <br />' sounding tape As each well was opened, and prior to taking the depth to groundwater <br /> measurement, a PID organic vapor meter was used VOC's in the head space of the well <br /> The water level reading was recorded to an accuracy of 0 01 foot In wells where free <br /> I floating product was suspected, a clear disposable bailer was used to gauge the interface <br /> No floating product was observed during this sampling event <br /> Stagnant water in the well casing was purged using a Grundfus electric submersible <br /> pump, and the rate of well purging was monitored Well MW-1 was purged of at least <br /> three casing volumes and then purged until the groundwater parameters (temperature, <br /> Iconductivity, and pH) had stabilized (Appendix C ) indicating that water, representative <br /> of actual aquifer conditions, was entering the well Groundwater parameter stabilization <br /> was characterized by three successive readings within 10% <br /> I On September 16, 1996, Del-Tech Geotechnical Support arrived on-site to re-sample <br /> P PP P <br /> well MW-1 for the purpose of verifying unexpectedly high levels of petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons which had been detected After the well was opened, a PID measurement <br /> was taken, and the depth to groundwater was measured as described above Stagnant <br /> water in the well casing was purged using a stainless steel bailer belayed with a servo <br /> actuated electric reel The rate of well purging was monitored The well was purged of at <br /> 2937 Veneman Ave ,#B240 Phase One Environmental Inc Phone (209) 569-0293 <br /> Modesto, CA 95356 Fax (209) 569-0295 <br />