Laserfiche WebLink
Pilot Testing Report and Conceptual Corrective Action Plan July 15, 1994 <br /> Manna Pro, 4004 South EI Dorado, Stockton, CA 20 <br /> observation points as shown on Table 6 This final test stage data most accurately modeled how an <br /> effective full-scale combined system would operate <br /> The induced vacuum measured in the observation points and site specific data was input into the <br />' Vent-ROI model The model assumptions are included in Appendix G The results of the model <br /> indicated that a radius of influence of 18 feet could be expected from a full scale system at a flow <br /> rate of 148 5 inches of water at each extraction well Table 8 summarizes the Vent-ROI model <br /> results <br /> For comparison purposes, the drawdown data from the combined groundwater extraction and HVE <br /> test at EW-1 was analyzed by the GWAP program (Appendix G) The calculated aquifer parameter <br /> values (Table 9), as compared to typical aquifer test results (Table 5), appear to be generally within <br /> an order-of-magnitude The combined test results do indicate an improved pumping well efficiency <br />' resulting in an increased rate of groundwater extraction It is expected that the resultant capture <br /> zones from a combined groundwater and high vacuum extraction system would be larger than the <br /> capture zone produced by groundwater extraction only <br /> 53 High Vacuum Dual Phase Extraction Test <br /> A High Vacuum Dual Phase Extraction (HVDPE) test was performed to meet the following objectives <br />' <br /> Quantify aquifer and vadose zone response onse to HVDPE <br /> p <br /> • Provide data to evaluate the feasibility of HVDPE as a stand-alone remedial <br /> technology for the site, and <br /> • Develop a model of HVDPE response for implementation of a full-scale remediation <br /> system <br /> 5 3 1 Methodology <br /> The HVDPE test was designed to extract the groundwater and extract sod vapor from the vadose <br />' zone using a liquid-ring pump as a stand alone system (i e , no submersible groundwater pump was <br /> used) Sod vapor and groundwater was withdrawn from the extraction well at a known vacuum and <br /> the resultant vapor and water flow rate was recorded Incremental increases in the vapor flow rate <br /> were made at the extraction well and the vacuum response induced in the subsurface was measured <br /> 2819RO34 070 <br /> GROUNDWATER <br /> TECHNOLOGY, INC <br />