My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0009475
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
EL DORADO
>
4004
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544711
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0009475
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2019 3:10:02 PM
Creation date
7/30/2019 2:20:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0009475
RECORD_ID
PR0544711
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005478
FACILITY_NAME
CUTTER LUMBER
STREET_NUMBER
4004
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
EL DORADO
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
17525005
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
4004 S EL DORADO ST
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
221
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pilot Testing Report and Conceptual Corrective Action Plan July 15, 1994 <br /> Manna Pro, 4004 South EI Dorado, Stockton, CA 22 <br />' 533 Results <br /> The field data measured during the HVDPE test is provided in Appendix H and summarized on <br /> Table 10 The fourth stage of the data collected during the HVDPE pilot test is summarized on <br /> Table 11 <br /> The intake of the drop tube was held at 36 to 38 feet below grade and the applied vacuum was <br /> increased in three stages During the fourth stage of the HVDPE pilot test, the drop tube (Intake) <br /> was lowered to the bottom of the well with full applied vacuum <br /> IDrawdown during the HVDPE test, as recorded by the data logger, is presented in Appendix H The <br /> data are presented showing date, elapsed time, and drawdown where each probe was located <br /> Table 11 identifies the wells that were monitored, and presents the maximum drawdown experienced <br /> at each well during fourth stage of the HVDPE test After 340 minutes of pumping, maximum <br /> drawdown was greatest in wells 013-1 and 013-2, located 9 5 feet and 13 feet, respectively from the <br /> pumping well <br /> 5 3 4 Data Analysis <br /> The low vacuum stage resulted in a groundwater flow rate of 0 15 gpm and vacuum extraction of 13 <br /> standard cubic feet per minute (scfm) Vacuum influence in adjacent wells was minimal due to the <br /> low induced vacuum Subsequent increases in the vacuum rates (stages 2 and 3) resulted in an <br /> increase in groundwater pumping rates, however vacuum influence in adjacent observation points <br /> remained relatively constant Monitoring data indicates that the vacuum increase was expended <br /> primarily to pump water from the extraction well The water level was depressed to the end of the <br /> drop tube and air was extracted from the vadose zone <br /> The field vacuum influence data recorded from the observation points fluctuated throughout the test <br /> The data was not conducive for use in the Vent-ROI model From the vacuum induced in the <br /> adjacent wells and past Groundwater Technology experience, a sod vapor extraction radius of <br /> influence of 5 to 10 feet is expected Typically, a radius of less than 10 feet is not economical and <br /> other treatment technologies are recommended <br />' During the last stage of the HVDPE test, the drop tube (intake) was lowered slowly to the bottom of <br /> the well Groundwater was extracted from the well and lifted up to 53 feet from below grade using <br />' 2819R034 070 LIM <br /> GROUNDWATER <br />' TECHNOLOGY,INC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.