My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
EL DORADO
>
8621
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0523156
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2019 4:00:36 PM
Creation date
7/30/2019 3:50:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
RECORD_ID
PR0523156
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0015632
FACILITY_NAME
NORTRAX
STREET_NUMBER
8621
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
EL DORADO
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
FRENCH CAMP
Zip
95231
APN
19320005
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
8621 S EL DORADO ST
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Environmental <br /> Mr.Michael J.Infurna Resources <br /> 9 November 2004 Management <br /> Page 2 <br /> United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Method 8015 <br /> Modified. Samples in which TPH was detected above the laboratory <br /> reporting limit were also analyzed for the following constituents: <br /> Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes (BTEX) by USEPA <br /> Method 8021B; and <br /> • Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) by USEPA Method 8270. <br /> Analytical results are summarized on Table 1 and the complete analytical <br /> report is provided in Appendix A. <br /> INVESTIGATION RESULTS <br /> An unidentified TPH compound in the diesel range was detected above <br /> laboratory reporting limits in the soil sample collected from boring SB-1 <br /> at 1 foot bgs. TPH was detected in this sample at a concentration of <br /> 1.4 milligrams per kilogram. The laboratory reported that the TPH <br /> detected did not match the typical diesel pattern and that it did not <br /> resemble any other petroleum hydrocarbon pattern for which the <br /> laboratory had a standard. BTEX and PAHs were not detected above <br /> laboratory reporting limits in this sample. TPH was not detected above <br /> laboratory reporting limits in the remaining three soil samples collected <br /> during the investigation. In addition, no field evidence of petroleum <br /> hydrocarbon impacts in soil (e.g., staining or odor) was noted during the <br /> drilling activities. <br /> CONCLUSIONS <br /> Based on the relatively low detection of TPH in one shallow soil sample <br /> during the subsurface investigation, no additional investigation of the <br /> property appears to be warranted. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.