My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
EL DORADO
>
7200
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544721
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2019 10:24:57 AM
Creation date
8/1/2019 9:50:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0544721
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0000104
FACILITY_NAME
QUICK N SAVE*
STREET_NUMBER
7200
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
EL DORADO
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
FRENCH CAMP
Zip
95231
APN
19316002
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
7200 S EL DORADO ST
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� I <br /> TABLE 1 - CHECKLIST OF REQUIRED DATA <br /> FOR NO FURTHER ACTION REQUESTS AT UNDERGROUND TANK SITES <br /> E <br /> Site Name and Location: Quick N Save Arco,7200 South Ll Dorado Street San Joaquin County(Lustis#391084) <br /> N 1. Distance top wells for municipal, domestic, agriculture, industry and A sensitive receptor survey was not <br /> other uses within 2000 feet of the site; required. <br /> Y 2. Site maps, to scale, of area impacted showing locations of any former and existing tank systems, One 6,000-gallon UST; <br /> excavation contours and sample locations, boring and monitoring well elevation contours, one 8,000-gallon UST; <br /> gradients;.and nearby surface wafers, buildings, streets, and subsurface utilities, and one 12,000-gallon <br /> UST removed in 12/99. <br /> FY, <br /> 3. Figures depicting lithology(cross section), treatment system diagrams; Sail consists feet below grouu silty sands and clays to 43 <br /> nd surface(bgs), the <br /> maximum depth investigated. <br /> MN <br /> 4. Stockpiled soil remaining on-site or off-site disposal(quantity); Excavated soil was reused as tank pit backfill. <br /> 5. Monitoring wells remaining on-site, fate; <br /> No monitoring wells were installed for investigation. <br /> _6_' a- re a is o 'N groundwater el a__M ns and depths f wdfe 'Groundwater was encountered-in-soil borings at <br /> approximately 33 feet bgs. <br /> LiLl 7. Tabulated results of all sampling and analyses: In 10/99,maximum soil concentrations in sample D6 were: TPHg; <br /> ii <br /> 825 mg/kg, Toluene; 6.95 mglkg, Ethelbenzene;373.55 mg/kg,and <br /> Detection limits for confirmation sampling Xylenes;6.5 mg/kg. Sample T2S:MTBE, 17.97 mg/kg. In 10199 all <br /> .1 %' <br /> ! groundwater samples were ND. On 6122104,all soil and groundwater Y Lead analyses samples were ND. <br /> 8. Concentration contours of contaminants found and those remaining in soil Soil impacts limited to vicinity of the <br /> and groundwater, and both on-site and off-site: former fuel dispensers, as defined by soil <br /> borings. <br /> Y❑ Lateral and Y❑ Vertical extent of soil contamination <br /> © Lateral and © Vertical extent of groundwater contamination <br /> 9. Zone of influence calculated and assumptions used for subsurface Based on the limited extent of soil <br /> remediation system and the zone of capture attained for the soil and contamination, an engineered remediation <br /> system was not required at this site. <br /> groundwater rernediation system; <br /> 10.Reports/information 0 Unauthorized Release Form ❑N QMRs(hates) <br /> �Y Well and boring logs PAR R FRP �Y Other,'Closure Summary Report <br /> Y 11,Best Available Technology(BAT) used or an explanation for not using BAT; Removal of gasoline US Ts and natural <br /> attenuation. <br /> Y 12.Reasons why background waars unattainable using BAT; Minor soil contamination remains on-site. <br /> - ....._ <br /> N 13.Mass balance calculation of substance treated versus that remaining; A mass balance for remaining pollution was <br /> a not calculated for soil <br /> :N::] 14. Assumptions, parameters, calculations and model used in A risk assessment was not required for this site. <br /> risk assessments, and fate and transport modeling; <br /> I, 15. Rationale why conditions remaining at site will not adversely Primary impact is to shallow soil(silt&clay)at 2 ft.bgs <br /> impact water quality, health, or other beneficial uses;and at dispenser sample location D6. Soil contamination is <br /> limited in extent and groundwater was encountered at <br /> 33 feet bgs. <br /> By: JLB/BK Comments:One 6 000-gallon UST, one 8,000-gallon UST;and one 12,000-gallon UST were removed in 12/99. <br /> Limited soil contamination was adequately characterized(laterally&vertically)by multiple sampling events. All <br /> Date: 2127106 impacts to soil are below current ESLs, with the exception of TPHg at 625 mg/kg(2 ft bgs). No structures are <br /> currently located on the property as the mini mart associated with the gas station was recently demolished. All <br /> gr7undwatersamples have been ND, as residual impacted soil is limited to approximately 10-15 feet bgs, 15 feet <br /> above historic high groundwater levels at the site."Additionally, vertical migration of constituents of concern is limited <br /> by the presence of a clayey silt layer approximately 15 feet bgs. Based on the limited extent of the remaining soil <br /> contamination. Reaional Board staff concur with San Joaauin Countv's Closure Recommendation. <br /> E , <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.