My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE FILE 1
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
EL DORADO
>
7906
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0540858
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE FILE 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2019 10:47:58 AM
Creation date
8/1/2019 10:10:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
FILE 1
RECORD_ID
PR0540858
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0023360
FACILITY_NAME
ARCO SERVICE STATION #2130
STREET_NUMBER
7906
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
EL DORADO
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95210
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
7906 N EL DORADO ST
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
该页面上没有批注。
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
288
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> From : Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Sent: Friday, April 21 , 2006 10:54 AM <br /> To : 'rbenkosky@secor.com' <br /> Cc: 'kshelton@secor.com' <br /> Subject: Arco 2130 WP apprvl-SJCEHD <br /> Rusty, Kristin . <br /> Here's the work plan approval for MW10-12 at 7906 EI Dorado, Stockton . ARCO-2130 . <br /> Note conditions/comments please. <br /> I referrred to a previous EHD letter so to help, I attached it also. The 2003 SCM was weak and the <br /> things I was looking for have never been submitted . So I'll need you folks to reconstruct a subsurface <br /> model that includes ALL the old data and new MW- 10, 11 , and 12's data . EHD suspects two <br /> plumes. . .one of HC, another of MtBE . . .we'll be looking for your evaluations that address vertical and <br /> horizontal delineation conclusions as well as residual mass calculations that support your numbers. . <br /> Be advised, proposals that include the use of oxidizers should be supported with site specific technical <br /> justification . EHD does not consider Ozone as the magic bullet. We use the EPA guidance docs to <br /> eval sites and proposals for ozone. Refer to Chaper XIII in the following doc/webpage. <br /> http ://www.epa.gov/OUST/pubs/tums. htm <br /> Another useful tool is Technical and Regulatory Guidance for In Situ Chemical Oxidation (ISCO) of <br /> Contaminated Soil and Groundwater, Second Edition, prepared by the Interstate Technology & <br /> Regulatory Council . I don't have the webpage for this doc, but I'm sure you already know about it, <br /> right? <br /> note the report due date. .WITHIN 60-days of the last well's installation . . . I suggest you start now to <br /> construct the missing cross sections and use the lithological data from the new wells to <br /> confirm/support the model . <br /> call me at (209) 468-3454 if you have any questions. <br /> 7906 EI Dorado WP 7906 EI Dorado <br /> apprvl boile... SCM CML 10-3-03.01 <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.