Laserfiche WebLink
+1 <br /> . Mr Kyle Christie Project 0805-114 04 <br /> December 6, 1995 <br /> Page 3 <br /> The wellhead elevations of the monitoring wells at the site were previously surveyed by <br /> Morrow Surveying of West Sacramento, California The surveyed elevations and the depth <br /> to groundwater measurements, summarized in Table 1, were used to evaluate the <br /> potentiometnc surface beneath the site The groundwater flow direction on August 28, <br /> 1995, was to the northeast, with a hydraulic gradient of 0 001 (see Figure 3) The <br /> groundwater flow direction in the past has generally been towards the east to southeast <br /> Groundwater elevation data are presented on Figure 3 and in Table 1 Groundwater <br /> elevations decreased 167 feet from the previous sampling event (May 1995) <br /> Groundwater samples collected from wells MW-1 through MW-8 and MW-10 were <br /> analyzed for TPHG, and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylene isomers using <br /> California Department of Health Services (DHS) LUFT Method and Environmental <br /> Protection Agency (EPA) Method 5030/8020, respectively These samples were analyzed <br /> at Columbia Analytical Services, Inc , in San Jose, California The results of these analyses <br /> are summanzed in Table 2 Copies of the chain-of-custody records and laboratory analysis <br /> reports are presented in Appendix B <br /> . Dissolved hydrocarbons were detected in wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-5, MW-6, and MW- <br /> 10 TPHG concentrations ranged from below detection limits in wells MW-3, MW-4, MW- <br /> 7, and MW-8 to 650 ppb in well MW-2 Benzene concentrations ranged from below <br /> detection limits in wells MW-3, MW-4, and MW-6 through MW-8 to 84 ppb in well <br /> MW-2 TPHG and benzene concentrations are shown on Figure 2 <br /> OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE REMEDIATION SYSTEM <br /> EMCON began the operation and maintenance of the remediation system in <br /> November 1994 The system consists of an air sparging-enhanced vapor extraction system <br /> with catalytic oxidation treatment (AIREX KATOX 100) The system is connected to one <br /> air sparging well (AS-1) and 12 vapor extraction wells (VW-1 through VW-12) The <br /> system has been operating with VW-5, VW-7, VW-9, VW-11, and VW-12 closed (see <br /> Table 5) The air sparge system has operated in conjunction with the SVE system During <br /> the third quarter 1995, air sparge wells AS-2 and AS-3 were connected to the system <br /> EMCON performed monthly site visits to evaluate and optimize system performance <br /> Copies of the field data sheets are presented in Appendix C <br /> Analytical results of influent and effluent samples collected on July 17, 1995, indicated that <br /> the system was not meeting the required destruction efficiency The system was shut down <br /> immediately and the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District was notified <br /> of the condition A source test was conducted on August 10, 1995, to reestablish system <br /> operating parameters and destruction efficiency The results of the source test indicated <br /> that the SVE system was in compliance and was restarted on August 27, 1995 The system <br /> was operational until October 6, 1995, when analytical results again indicated poor <br /> SAON\P1UA80M8051140 4Es-95\pas 1 <br />