Laserfiche WebLink
MRS <br /> • Mr Michael Infuma Page 2 <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department <br /> September 2, 2003 <br /> SCOPE OF WORK <br /> URS conducted vertical groundwater flow on SVE wells VW-2 and VW-10 and well condition assess- <br /> ments on groundwater monitoring wells MW-2 and MW-5 Welenco, Inc , of Bakersfield, California <br /> was subcontracted to perform the depth-discrete vertical flow analysis for wells wells VW-2 and VW-10 <br /> using a FloVisionTM flowmeter probe The FloVisionT'* apparatus indicated the direction and flux of <br /> groundwater movement within the wells Analyses were performed at approximately 2-foot depth <br /> intervals along the submerged portion of the screen interval listed in Table 1 <br /> Data from the FloVistonT"^ apparatus was used by Welenco to create profiles for wells VW-2 and <br /> VW-10 showing the direction (up or down) and flux of groundwater along the well screen as shown in <br /> Attachment A This information was used by URS to to determine if wells VW-2 and VW-10 are acting <br /> as vertical conduits for shallow contamination to impact deeper water-bearing zones <br /> Additionally, a separate down-hole camera designed to photograph the interior of wells MW-2 and <br /> MW-5 was used to assess the condition of wells(weeping perched layers, breaks in the casing,debris on <br /> the well bottom, biological growth, etc ) <br /> . RESULTS <br /> Inspection of well VW-2 found the well intact The FloVisionTm apparatus encountered groundwater at <br /> 43 feet below ground surface (bgs) and was run to a depth of approximately 58 feet bgs Analysis of <br /> groundwater flux findicates downward flow is occurring at the very bottom of the well from 55 feet to <br /> 58 feet bgs Recorded flow was too slow to be measured accurately (below 1 foot per minute [fpm]) <br /> however an averaged rate of 0 34 fpm with an averaged flow volume of 0 22 gallons per minute (gpm) <br /> were estimated No vertical flow was recorded in the upper portion of the well (43 feet to 55 feet bgs) <br /> Geology at this location consists of silt from 23 feet to 53 feet bgs with a silty sand layer from 53 feet to <br /> 58 feet bgs From 58 feet to 62 feet is another silt layer with silty sands from 62 feet to the maximum <br /> well depth of approximately 64 feet The vertical flows recorded are Iocated in the silty sand layer <br /> located between two silt layers (see boring log in Attachment B) Because of sediment to the well, <br /> vertical flow readings could not be recorded below 58 feet <br /> Inspection of well VW-10 found the well intact The FloVisionTm apparatus encountered groundwater at <br /> 44 feet bgs and was run to a depth of approximately 54 feet bgs Analysis of groundwater flux indicates <br /> there is no flow <br /> Video logging of wells MW-2 and MW-5 showed the wells to be in good condition with no broken or <br /> damaged sreens The FloVisionTm apparatus encountered groundwater at 44 feet bgs for well MW-2 and <br /> was run to a depth of approximately 73 feet bgs For well MW-5 the apparatus encountered ground- <br /> water at 43 feet and was run to a depth of approximately 68 feet bgs <br /> i <br /> K 1WprocessU5 BP ARC0102I30Wertical Flow Study12130 Vgradient Report V2 doe <br />