Laserfiche WebLink
-; Quarterly Report - February 1998 <br /> ELKHORN COUNTRY CLUB <br /> 1050 Elkhorn Drive, Stockton, California <br /> 1.0. INTRODUCTION <br /> In accordance with a request from Mr. Bob. Young of Elkhorn Country Club, Advanced <br /> 'i <br /> GeoEnvironmental, Inc., (AGE) has prepared this Quarterly Report of field activities performed <br /> during the first quarter of 1998 at 1050 Elkhorn Drive, Stockton, California (the site). The scope of <br /> work included monitoring,purging and sampling of six monitoring wells and two air-sparging well <br /> on the site. The site and its surroundings are illustrated in Figure 1 -Location Map. Structures and <br /> ground water monitoring well locations on the site are depicted in Figure 2 - Sile Plan. <br /> The monitoring and sampling were performed in accordance with guidelines established by the San <br /> Joaquin County Public Health Departmeni-Environmental Health Division(PHS-EHD)and Central <br /> Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB) for investigation of underground <br /> storage tank sites. Site history and findings from previous investigations and monitoring events at <br /> -the site are detailed in the Corrective Action Plan, 27 June 1996 (CAP) and previous Quarterly <br /> Reports prepared by AGE. <br /> .r, <br /> 2.0. PROCEDURES <br /> 2.1. MONITORING WELL PURGING <br /> On 27 February 1997, the water level in monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-6 and 'both air- <br /> sparging wells was measured relative to the top of the well casings using a Solinst water level meter. <br /> After water levels were measured, approximately six gallons of water (a minimum of tluee well <br /> volumes) were removed from air-sparging wells VW-1, VW-2 and each ground water monitoring <br /> well using a submersible PVC pump. Purged water was stored on-site in 55-gallon drums. <br /> _; <br /> 2.2. SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS <br /> Water samples were collected from the purged wells using new disposable plastic bailers. The <br /> ._� collected samples were transferred into 40-m1 EPA-approved VOA vials. The samples were labeled, <br /> logged on a chain-of-custody form, placed in a chilled container and transported to McCampbell <br /> Analytical, Inc. (MAI) in Pacheco, California. <br /> Each sample was analyzed in accordance with: <br /> • EPA method 5030/8015m for total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH=g) <br /> • EPA method 8020 for volatile aromatics (benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene and xylenes: <br /> Advanced GeAnvironmcnlal,Inc. <br />