My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0010886
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
ELKHORN
>
1050
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0505234
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0010886
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2019 3:25:31 PM
Creation date
8/1/2019 2:22:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0010886
RECORD_ID
PR0505234
PE
2951
FACILITY_ID
FA0001103
FACILITY_NAME
Elkhorn Golf Club
STREET_NUMBER
1050
STREET_NAME
ELKHORN
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95209
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1050 ELKHORN DR
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
rpm, <br /> 28 February 1997 <br /> AGE Project No. 95-0118 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> 3.0. FINDINGS <br /> i � <br /> .3.1. RELATIVE GROUND 'WATER ELEVATION AND GRADIENT <br /> I,'j The relative ground water elevation in each well was calculated by subtracting the ground water <br /> depth from the surveyed relative casing elevation(Table 1). During the December 1996 sampling, <br /> the depth to ground water at the site ranged from 36.80 to 3 8.67 feet with the ground water"gradient <br /> divergent from the eastern edge of the vicinity of the maintenance shop toward the southwest and <br /> the northeast. Between August and December 1996, the relative.ground water elevation increased <br /> an average 1.08 feet. <br /> In December 1996, a ground water mound or `high' was present in the area of monitoring well MW- <br /> 2, from which point it appears that growid water has a radial flow toward the north, west south and <br /> possibly east. The steepest gradient in the measurable area appears to be toward the southwest at an <br /> estimated 0.033 ft/ft or approximately 1.9°. Relative ground water elevation contours are illustrated <br /> j in Figure 3 -RelatiYe Ground Water Elevation. <br /> is - <br /> -=z` 3.2. ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> r Water samples from MW-2 and MW-3 contained TPH-g at concentrations of 840 parts per billion <br /> (ppb, reported as micrograms per liter) and 4,800 ppb, respectively. The same samples contained <br /> benzene at concentrations of 41. ppb and 130 ppb, toluene at.170 ppb and 450 ppb, ethylbenzene at <br /> 23 ppb and 74 ppb, and xylenes at 130 ppb and 960 ppb,repectively. <br /> Hydrocarbons were not detected in samples collected from MW-I, MW-4, MW-5 or MW-6. <br /> I _ Analytical results of ground water samples are summarized in Table 2. The laboratory report(MAI <br /> Lab ID 67869 to 67874) and chain-of custody are included as Appendix B. <br /> 4.0. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> is <br /> 4.1. CONCLUSIONS <br /> Based upon results of ground water monitoring and well sampling, AGE has the following <br /> conclusions: <br /> '! ! The relative ground water elevation during the last quarter has increased an average 1.08 feet. <br /> I <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.