My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0010889
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
ELKHORN
>
1050
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0505234
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0010889
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2019 3:25:51 PM
Creation date
8/1/2019 2:23:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0010889
RECORD_ID
PR0505234
PE
2951
FACILITY_ID
FA0001103
FACILITY_NAME
Elkhorn Golf Club
STREET_NUMBER
1050
STREET_NAME
ELKHORN
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95209
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1050 ELKHORN DR
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
27 June 1996 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 95-0118 <br /> Page 19 of 23 <br /> Contaminated ground water is "treated" by adding hydrocarbon-degrading microbes or by <br /> '= augmenting natural hydrocarbon degradation activities with introduction of nutrients. <br /> Fr, <br /> 8.2.3. FEASIBILITY TESTING <br /> -_1 Aquifer testing has not been performed at the site. A pump test could be performed on wells MW-2 <br /> or MW-3 to determine aquifer properties, if necessary. <br /> There are several disadvantages to "pump and treat methods The more serious disadvantages <br /> include: 1) extended cleanup periods, resulting in increased total costs, although the maintenance <br /> for this method is relatively cost-effective and 2) regulatory cleanup goals are rarely attainable, <br /> mostly due to persistent hydrocarbons detected in subsequent sampling events. Ground water . <br /> extraction is generally not a desirable method for remediation. <br /> 8.2.4. DURATION <br /> Experience has shown that all systems involving ground water extraction require much more time <br /> than would be anticipated from aquifer tests and calculations of ground water discharge rates, and <br /> seldom achieve regulatory goals for ground water clean-up. Systems typically operate for several <br /> years. During this time,pumps and other equipment may need replacement several times. Currently, <br /> the primary utility of pump-and-treat systems is to control migration of contaminated ground water. <br /> 8.2.5. COST <br /> .`' Ground water extraction is usually a very costly method of ground water treatment. Cost for <br /> installation of a"pump and treat" system typically ranges from $20,000 to $30,000, including the <br /> installation of one large-diameter extraction well.However, once extracted,the contaminated water <br /> must be treated or disposed. Treatment is highly dependant upon the concentrations of dissolved <br /> hydrocarbons in the ground water. For the Elkhorn site, the cost per gallon could be as great as <br /> $2.00,based upon the extraction/treatment of approximately 175;000 to 200,000 {45 feet X 5 feet <br /> in depth X 7.48 gal./cubic foot)gallons of contaminated ground water. Costs for the entire treatment <br /> project would likely be between. $200,000 and $450,000. . <br /> 8:3. IN SITUBIOREMEDIATION/BIOENHANCEMENT <br /> 8.3.1. BASIC PRINCIPLES <br /> Bioremediation involves the introduction of hydrocarbon-degrading microbes or supplemental <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.