Laserfiche WebLink
kfFf{, 27 June 1996 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 95-0118 <br /> Page 21 of 23 <br /> _l Typical costs for monthly monitoring of an in-situ bioremediation system, in addition to standard <br /> quarterly sampling, would be approximately $1,000.00 per month. Based on a two-year treatment <br /> period, the total cost for in-situ bioremediation at the Elkhorn site could be between $75,000 and <br /> r= $110,000. <br /> !,,_d 9.0. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR REMEDIATION OF HYDROCARBON-IMPACTED <br /> ' SOIL <br /> =� Based upon analytical results of soil samples collected during the investigation of the former UST <br /> area, it appears that hydrocarbon-impacted soil extends approximately 15 feet northwest and 10 feet <br /> east of the former UST excavation, having a radius of approximately 25 feet. The impacted soil <br /> appears to be distributed between 10 and 40 feet bsg. Approximately 1,000 to 1,200 cubic yards of <br /> hydrocaron-impacted soil is residual on the site. A lithologic cross section of the impacted area is <br /> depicted in Figure 6 - Lithologic Cross Section. <br /> Since impacted soil extends beneath the maintenance building, excavation is probably not feasible. <br /> Therefore,an in-situ method should be considered.Both in-situ methods described in this CAP could <br /> be equally effective in remediating the site. From a cost basis, implementation of an in-situ <br /> bior�TOation program could potentially be less expensive than soil vapor extraction. However, <br /> r monitoring requirements, duration and limited controls of the technology could increase the cost <br /> significantly. Therefore, we recommend installation of an SVE system at the site. <br /> .= The use of an SVE system at the Elkhorn site could remove up to 90%to 95% of the "pollutants" <br /> from the soil. Thus,the anticipated remaining concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons would be <br /> - - small: Soil remediation methods, estimated durations and associated costs are summarized on Table <br /> ` 7. <br /> r=1 <br /> Because of the relatively high flow rates measured during the SVE pilot test, a unit capable of at <br /> GJ_r' least 100 scfm will be required for remediation at the site;a thermal oxidation or internal combustion <br /> SVE unit would be the most cost-effective choice. A 6 to 18 month soil remediation period can be <br /> _ expected. Installation of an SVE system should include installation of two additional soil vapor <br /> extraction wells within the contaminated soil plume; this will allow the rapid removal of <br /> hydrocarbon contaminants- One soil vapor extraction well should be installed north of MW-2; a <br /> second soil vapor extraction well should be installed south of MW-3. The SVE well network should <br /> include all extraction wells and monitoring wells MW-2 and MW-3. <br /> A Remedial Action Work Plan detailing the proposed installation and operation of the SVE system <br /> ;. :.1 should be prepared, <br /> •1 <br />