Laserfiche WebLink
27 June 1996 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 95-0118 <br /> Page 4 of 23 <br /> I <br /> 3.4. COLLECTION OF SOIL FOR MICROBIOLOGICAL/PHYSICOCHEMICAL ANALYSES <br /> On. 15 February 1996, a grab soil sample, from a depth of 15 feet bsg, was collected by a <br /> representative of AGE. The soil sample was collected in a metric soil sampler loaded with two pre- <br /> cleaned 2-inch by 3-inch brass sleeves. The ends of the lead sample sleeve were covered with Teflon <br /> sheets, capped and sealed with tape. The samples were stored under ice in a chilled container and <br /> transported to an independent microbiologist, Mr. A. Keith Kaufmann of Culver City, California, <br /> and analyzed for physicochemical properties and microbiological enumeration. <br /> 3.5. ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF SOIL SAMPLES <br /> A total of eight soil samples were submitted to MAI for analysU All samples analyzed were <br /> collected from depths of 15 to 50 feet bsg. TPH-g was detected in sample VW1-25 (former UST <br /> area) at 2;100 ppm; BTE&X were detected in the same sample at concentrations up to 0.95 ppm. <br /> jLow concentrations of TPH-g and BTE&X were also detected in the other samples submitted for <br /> analysis. Analytical results of the soil samples are summarized in Table 1 The laboratory report <br /> (MAI Laboratory I. D. Nos. 60827 through 60834) and chain-of-custody forms are included in <br /> Appendix B. <br /> The analytical results of soil samples submitted for physicochemical analysis and microbiological <br /> enumeration indicated low microbe viability at the site. The reported concentration of nitrogen, <br /> which is required for microbial growth and maintenance of bioremedial activities,was below optimal <br /> f. levels. The low total microbe populations encountered may be due to the lack of the necessary <br /> nutrients. Of the microbiological population present, a high proportion were hydrocarbon-degrading <br /> bacteria,probably the result of the presence of the hydrocarbons in the soil serving as a food source. <br /> The microbiological laboratory report(A.Keith Kaufman report dated February 26, 1996)and chain- <br /> of-custody <br /> hain- <br /> ofcustody form are included in Appendix C. <br /> 4.0. QUARTERLY GROUND WATER MONITORING, FEBRUARY 1996 <br /> I <br /> 4.1. GROUND WATER MONITORING PROCEDURES <br /> On 01 February 1996, the water level in each.well (MW-1 through MW-6) was measured relative <br /> to the top of the well casing using a Solinst water level meter (Table 2). After water levels were <br /> measured,approximately 5 to 6 gallons of water(a minimum of three well volumes)were evacuated <br /> from each well using a PVC bailer. Temperature,pH and conductivity were measured at one-gallon <br /> intervals using an ICM model 52200 water analyzer. Stabilization data and field logs are included <br /> in Appendix D. The purged water was stored on-site in 55-gallon drums. <br />