My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0010890
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
ELKHORN
>
1050
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0505234
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0010890
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2019 3:13:49 PM
Creation date
8/1/2019 2:24:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0010890
RECORD_ID
PR0505234
PE
2951
FACILITY_ID
FA0001103
FACILITY_NAME
Elkhorn Golf Club
STREET_NUMBER
1050
STREET_NAME
ELKHORN
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95209
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1050 ELKHORN DR
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
26 December 1995 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 95-0118 <br /> Page 3 of 6 <br /> For each sample, both ends of the lead tube were covered with aluminum sheets, capped and sealed <br /> with tape. The samples were then stored on ice and transported under chain-of-custody to <br /> McCampbell Analytical, Inc. (MAI) in Pacheco, California. The laboratory report and chain-of- <br /> custody form for the soil samples are enclosed in Appendix A. <br /> During drilling, auger returns were monitored for the presence of organic vapors using a photo- <br /> "1 ionization detector(PID: Thermo Environmental 580A, 10.0 eV, calibrated to isobutyIene). Auger <br /> returns were then placed on plastic sheeting and stored on-site. <br /> 3.2. LOGGING <br /> Soil was extruded from the second brass tube and screened for the presence of organic vapors, using <br /> PID, and the readings were recorded on the boring logs. The soil was then described in accordance <br /> with Unified Soil Classification System(see Boring Logs, Appendix B). <br /> 3.3. WELL COMPLETION <br /> Borings MW-4, MW-5 and MW-6 were completed as ground water monitoring wells using 2-inch <br /> _i diameter PVC casing with 0.020-inch slotted screen from depths of 28 to 48 feet bsg. The filter pack, <br /> .:, Lonestar sand#2, was installed from 26 to 49 feet. Bentonite chips were used to make a three-foot <br /> .plug and the well was grouted to the surface with Portland cement. <br /> 3.4. MONITORING WELL PURGE PROCEDURES <br /> On 14 September 1995, the water level in each well (MW-1 through MW-6) was measured relative <br /> to the top of casing using a Solinst water level meter (Table 1). After water levels were measured, <br /> approximately 5 to 6.gallons.of water(a minimum of three well volumes)were evacuated from each <br /> well using a PVC bailer. Temperature, pH and conductivity were measured at one-gallon intervals <br /> using an ICM model 52200 water analyzer. Stabilization data and field logs are included in Appendix <br /> :# C. The purged water was stored on-site in 55-gallon drums. <br /> 3.5. GROUND WATER SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS <br /> Water samples were collected from each well using a new disposable plastic bailer by transferring the <br /> collected water into 40-nil EPA vials. The samples were logged on a chain-of-custody form, placed <br /> in a chilled container and transported to McCampbell Analytical Inc. (MAI) in Pacheco, California. <br /> Each sample was analyzed for TPH-g and BTE&X in accordance with EPA methods 5030/8015m <br /> 1 <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.