Laserfiche WebLink
` Quarterly Report- January 1999 <br /> ELKHORN COUNTRY CLUB <br /> 1050 Elkhorn Drive, Stockton, California <br /> 1.0. INTRODUCTION <br /> At the request of Mr. Bob Young of Elkhorn Country Club, Advanced GeoEnvironmental, Inc. <br /> (AGE) has prepared this Quarterly Report of field activities performed during the first quarter of <br /> 1999 at 1050 Elkhorn Drive, Stockton, California(the site). <br /> The scope of work included monitoring,purging and sampling of six monitoring wells and two in- <br /> situ air-sparging (IAS) wells on the site. The site and its surroundings are illustrated in Figure 1. <br /> E Structures and ground water monitoring well locations on the site are depicted in Figure 2. Site <br /> history and findings from previous investigations and monitoring events at the site are detailed in <br /> the Corrective Action Plan, 27 June 1996(CAP) and the Quarterly Reports- December 1996,dated <br /> i ' <br /> 28 February 1997,prepared by AGE. <br /> Monitoring and sampling were performed in accordance with guidelines established by the Central <br /> i Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board(CVRWQCB) and by the San Joaquin County Public <br /> Health Services - Environmental Health Division (PHS-EHD) for subsurface investigation of <br /> underground storage tank sites. <br /> 2.0. PROCEDURES <br /> 2.1. MONITORING WELL PURGING <br /> On January 22, the depth to water in monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-6 and in air-sparging. <br /> wells IAS-1 and IAS-2 was measured relative to the top of the well casings using a Solinst water <br /> level meter. After water Ievels were measured, approximately 8 gallons of water (a minimum of <br /> three well volumes) were removed from air-sparging wells IAS-1, IAS-2 and from each ground <br /> water monitoring well using a submersible PVC pump. An ICM Model 52200 water analyzer was <br /> utilized to monitor temperature, pH and conductivity of purged water at regular purge volumes. <br /> Stabilization data and field logs are included in Appendix A. Purged ground water was containerized <br /> in 55-gallon drums and stored on-site. <br /> 2.2. SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS <br /> Water samples were collected from the purged wells using new disposable plastic bailers. The <br /> collected samples were transferred into EPA-approved 40-m1 VOA vials containing 0.5 milliliters <br /> hydrochloric acid(18%) as a sample preservative. The samples were labeled, Iogged on a chain-of- <br /> custody form,placed in a chilled container and transported to McCarnpbell Analytical, Inc. (MAI) <br /> Advanced GcoEnvironmental,Inc. <br />