My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0010940
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
ENTERPRISE
>
355
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544728
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0010940
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2019 5:02:14 PM
Creation date
8/1/2019 4:43:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0010940
RECORD_ID
PR0544728
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003802
FACILITY_NAME
ACCURATE DELIVERY SYSTEMS
STREET_NUMBER
355
STREET_NAME
ENTERPRISE
STREET_TYPE
PL
City
TRACY
Zip
95304
APN
21221008
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
355 ENTERPRISE PL
P_LOCATION
03
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
29 January 2003 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 97-0360 <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br /> in the groundwater sample collected from well EW 1 at a concentration of 2.8 Vg/l.No other analytes <br /> were detected at or above laboratory reporting limits in the ground water samples. <br /> The analytical results of ground water samples are summarized on Table 2. The laboratory report <br /> (CTEL Project No. CT214-0208059), QA/QC report and chain-of-custody form are included in <br /> Appendix B. <br /> 4.0. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> Based on the data collected from the site,AGE concludes: <br /> • Ground water flow at the site on 13 August 2002 was inferred to be toward the north at a <br /> gradient of 0.002 feet/feet. <br /> • TPH- was detected in the ground water samples collected from wells MW 1 and EW 1 at <br /> ,,-• g � P <br /> concentrations of 170µg/1 and 290µg/l,respectively,and TPH-d was detected in the ground <br /> water sample collected from well EWl at a concentration of 2.8%g/l. No other target 1I)q-- <br /> analytes were detected, in the present samples as well as samples collected from the two '- 17103 <br /> previous quarterly monitoring events (Table 2). <br /> • With the exception of TPH-d,the lateral extent of petroleum hydrocarbon-impacted ground <br /> ` water has been defined in all directions. TPH-d is not defined east of the former UST area. <br /> i <br /> • The vertical extent has been defined; petroleum hydrocarbon-impacted ground water does <br /> not extend below 35 feet bsg. A map illustrating the approximate extent of dissolved TPH-g <br /> is presented in Figure 4. <br /> 5.0. RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Based on the findings of the environmental activities recounted in this report, AGE recommends <br /> continued quarterly ground water monitoring;the next monitoring event was performed inNovember <br /> 2002. If concentrations of TPH-g remain stable in the samples collected in November, AGE <br /> recommends the site be considered for closure and a closure summary report be prepared. <br /> 6.0. LIMITATIONS <br /> Our professional services were performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by <br /> environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities. The findings were based upon <br /> analytical results provided by an independent laboratory.Evaluation of the hydrogeologic conditions <br /> ' Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.