Laserfiche WebLink
�-'WLE 1 - CHECKLIST OF REQUIRED DATA <br />` FOR NO FUR 'R ACTION REQUESTS AT UNDERGROUN4400pkNK SITES <br />carp Name and LOC2tiOn: JLN Farms/Joe Panetta Property, 95 W. Eleventh St., Tracy, San Joaquin County (Case 391152) <br />_� wn <br />Distance to production wells formunicipal, domestic, A 1997 well survey for the adjacent unevror► sna JUWIILIFI .W <br />Y supply2,000'o with the nearest l!!s <br />'culture, industry and other uses within 2000 feet of the site. /is upon�samplrng data, no we <br />feet tlo the south <br />are threatened due to this case. <br />2. Site maps, to scale, of area impacted showing locations Contained in several reports on file. <br />Y . <br />of any former and existing tank systems, excavation <br />contours and sample locations, boring and monitoring well <br />elevation contours, gradients, and nearby surface waters, <br />buildings, streets, and subsurface utilities; <br />Site lithology consists of sand, silt, and clay to focal depth of. <br />Y 3. Figures depicting lithology (cross section), treatment 35 feet. <br />system diagrams; <br />Approximately 730 yds. of contaminated soil excavated <br />Y 4. Stockpiled soil remaining on-site or off-site disposal (quantity); during corrective action was transported to Forward <br />Landfill, Manteca. . <br />A reported 13 monitoring wells installed over time. All monitoring wells will <br />y 5. Monitoring wells remaining on-site, fate; <br />be properly abandoned prior to formal closure per County. <br />Depth to groundwater varied from --8 feet to -13 feet below ground <br />-to <br />6. Tabulated results of a!! groundwater 0.036--ftlft. <br />'-surface (bgs)�The groundwater -gradient -varied from 0:002 <br />` _ <br />`"elevations and`depths to wale%' <br />The downgradient groundwater flow direction varied from northwest to <br />southeast. <br />7. Tabulated results of all sampling All data adequately tabularized in various reports, including closure report. <br />and analyses: <br />Y❑ Detection limits for confirmation <br />sampling <br />Lead analyses <br />8. Concentration contours of contaminants found and those remaining in soil and <br />The extent of the identified <br />groundwater, and both on-site and off-site: <br />contamination shown in applicable <br />Y❑ Latera! and FY] Vertical extent of soil contamination <br />reports. <br />Latera! and Vertical extent of groundwater contamination <br />Zone of influence calculated and assumptions used for subsurface remediation <br />Over -excavation was the <br />yJ9. <br />system and the zone of capture attained for the soil and groundwater remediation <br />engineered remediation. <br />system; <br />10. Reports /information FY]Unauthorized Release Form QY QMRs (from 2000 to 2009) <br />F Well and boring logs E PAR FRP Other,• Closure Summary Report, 2009 <br />Y 11, Best Available Technology (BAT) used or an explanation for not using BA71-naturalattehuation. <br />emoval of USTs, over excavation and <br />-.Y -12.-Reasons whTbackgrogo-drwas/is unattainable=usingBA'T,— <br />-LirriitL-d so►! and`groundwater contamination remain`on- - <br />site. <br />y 13. Mass balance calculation of substance treated versus that <br />The consultant estimates TPH-g removed from soil as <br />504 pounds, and TPHg remaining in soil as 104 pounds. <br />remaining; <br />�, 14. Assumptions, parameters, calculations and model used in <br />Due to the depth of remaining TPHg in soil (12'-15" bgs) <br />risk assessments, and fate and transport modeling; <br />and existence of a vapor barrier installed for the building, <br />a vapor intrusion survey was not required by the <br />regulatory agency. <br />Y 15. Rationale why conditions remaining at site will not adversely. <br />Groundwater concentrations continue to decline with <br />impact water quality, health, or other beneficial uses; and <br />many wells already at non -detect. Consultant estimates <br />WQGs reached by 2011. Site no longer poses a threat. <br />By: JLB L <br />Comments: Site (former Phillips station) is located adjacent to a 1997 closed UST site (Chevron), and property <br />•!� <br />use (commercial) is not expected to change. Due to remedial efforts in the source area, confirmation sampling <br />has shown that this site no longer poses a threat to -human health and safety or to water quality. Regional <br />Date: <br />10127!09 <br />Board staff concurs with San Joaquin County's recommendation for issuance of a No Further Action letter. <br />