Laserfiche WebLink
C A M B R I A <br /> production wells Cambria also reviewed United States Geologic Survey topographic and <br /> California State Automobile Association maps to identify surface water bodies within 2,000 feet <br /> of the site Table 4 summarizes the well information, Table 5 presents the door-to-door survey <br /> results, and Figure I shows the receptor survey study area, the results of the well survey, and the <br /> surface water bodies <br /> DWR Record Review A review of California DWR records identified 12 wells within a <br /> 2,000-foot radius of the subject site The wells were installed between 1949 and 1997 Six of <br /> the wells were installed for domestic use, one was for irrigation use, two were for industrial use, <br /> one was for municipal use, and two wells were of unknown use The closest well is a municipal <br /> well located approximately 1,100 feet northeast (cross-gradient) of the Shell-branded station <br /> Available well construction information is summarized on Table 4 and the approximate well <br /> Iocations are plotted on Figure 1 <br /> Door-to-Door Survey No water production well was identified within 500 feet of the site <br /> during the door-to-door survey Three monitoring wells were identified at the Chevron service <br /> station located at 4344 Waterloo Road, approximately 250 feet east of the subject site Data <br /> obtained during the door-to-door survey is presented in Table 5 and the questionnaires are <br /> included in Appendix G <br /> Surface Water Bodies• Two surface water bodies were identified within the study area <br /> Unnamed ponds are located at the San Joaquin Storm Water Facility, which is located <br /> approximately 250 feet north of the site and a diverting canal is approximately 1,900 feet <br /> southwest of the site The surface water bodies are identified on Figure 1 <br /> Results The closest receptor to the subject site is the San Joaquin County Storm Water Facility <br /> located approximately 250 feet north of the site Data from the fourth quarter 2001 monitoring <br /> event suggest that groundwater flow direction at the subject site is toward the northwest <br /> Therefore, none of the 12 water-producing wells, the San Joaquin County Storm Water Facility, <br /> nor the diverting canal are located downgradient of the site The wells are located from 1,150 to <br /> 1,900 feet from the subject site and the diverting canal is 1,900 feet from the site Due to the <br /> large distance and direction (cross-gradient) of the receptors to the site, it is unlikely that any site <br /> activities would impact these potential receptors <br /> 1359 7 <br />