Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> lie 19 March 2001 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 97-0300 <br /> I Page 3 of 4 <br /> i <br /> 3 1 GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND GRADIENT <br /> The depths to ground water In wells MW-1, MW-2 and MW-3 were measured between 44 24 and <br /> p �' <br /> 44 90 feet below the tops of the well casings Ground water elevations at the site were calculated to <br /> be between 27 08 feet and 27 15 feet below mean sea level, ground water elevations are depicted in <br /> Figure 3 Ground water elevations at the site increased an average 7 26 feet between the September <br /> I 2000 and the December 2000 ground water monitoring events On 28 December 2000, the general <br /> ground water gradient at the site was calculated to be approximately 0 001 ft/fl or approximately 5 <br /> feet per mile and directed towards the south (Figure 3) <br /> 3 2 LABORATORY RESULTS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> Dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon constituents, volatile aromatic compounds and fuel oxygenated <br /> compounds were not detected by the December 2000 laboratory analysis Analytical results of the <br /> ground water samples are summarized in Table 2 The laboratory reports (McCampbell Analytical <br /> Inc I D 57234 through 57236) and chain-of-custody forms are presented in Appendix B <br /> 4.0. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> IThe implications from the findings of the December 2000 fourth quarter ground water monitoring <br /> event are <br /> I • Ground water flow direction at the site appeared to be oriented generally south at a gradient <br /> of 0 001 (Figure 3) Due to the low gradient at the site, slight variations in ground water <br /> I measurements or changes of recharge/discharge of the local ground water could greatly <br /> modify the modeled ground water flow direction <br /> • The ground water elevation at the site was within the screened intervals of wells MW-1, <br /> MW-2 and MW-3 and yield samples fully representative of shallow ground water conditions <br /> • Ground water elevations at the site increased an average 7 26 feet between the September <br /> 2000 and the December 2000 ground water monitoring events (Table 1) The increase of <br /> ground water elevations is probably due to the seasonal fluctuation pattern <br /> • No petroleum hydrocarbon constituents, volatile aromatic compounds or fuel oxygenated <br /> compounds were detected by laboratory analysis, however very low concentrations of <br /> dissolved TPH-d have previously been detected in the area of monitoring well MW-1 <br /> indicating that there is only a minor impact to ground water in the area assessed <br /> • Advanced Geo Environmental,Inc <br />