Laserfiche WebLink
vapor stream containing 0 03 mg/L as gasoline and 1 . 2% carbon <br /> dioxide, see Table 3 . <br /> The above results show that the weekly two hour venting of MW8 , <br /> is removing excess carbon dioxide and allowing oxygen transfer to <br /> occur A calculated 2 . 89 pounds of gasoline range hydrocarbons <br /> has been removed from MW8 as of June 27, 1996 , see Table 3 and <br /> Appendix B - Field Notes and Appendix D for methods and <br /> proceedures . <br /> SUMMARY <br /> There has been no evidence of floating product or product sheen <br /> on the groundwater an MW1 since April 14, 1992 and MW3 and MW10 <br /> since November 11, 1992 The last evidence of product, as a <br /> sheen in the condensate recovery system, was on March 1, 1993 . <br /> Vapor recovery has reduced the hydrocarbons in groundwater <br /> significantly since the May 25, 1990 sampling, see Table 1 . <br /> On January 31, 1996 a sample of the water being treated by air <br /> stripping inside the "Convault" was obtained for certified <br /> laboratory analysis This was accomplished to prove the <br /> suitability for dumping this cleaned water to the City of <br /> Stockton' s sanitary sewer This water (800 gallons) was <br /> discharged to sewer on February 20, 1996 . Since that time there <br /> . has been no additional discharge to sewer. <br /> Bio-venting of MW8 was initiated on October 26, 1994 Sample <br /> results obtained of the groundwater at and near MW8 suggests that <br /> this weekly venting is beneficial in controlling the migration of <br /> the gasoline hyrocarbon plume <br /> As of October 17, 1996 an estimated 12085 5 gallons of gasoline <br /> range hydrocarbons have been removed from the soil and <br /> groundwater beneath this site . The 12085 5 gallons consists of <br /> previously removed floating product (40 25 gallons) , condensation <br /> from vapor extraction (48 75 gallons) , pro3ected petroleum <br /> hydrocarbon vapor extraction-destruction using Thermal Oxidation <br /> (74849 pounds/6 25 = 11975 . 8 gallons) , projected petroleum <br /> hydrocarbon vapor extraction-adsorbtion using Activated Carbon <br /> (126 5 pounds/6 25 = 20 . 24 gallons) and venting of MW8 (2 89 <br /> pounds/6 25 = 0 46 gallons) No chlorinated solvents were <br /> detected in chromatogram comparisons of the vapor samples ; "i e " <br /> 1 2 Dichloroethene (DCE) - refpnt_ i cin time_ 7 079 mi niitpA <br /> Trichloroethylene (TCE) - retention time 3 023 minutes^ and <br /> Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) - retention time 3 75 minutes <br /> In the past, water samples from MW1 and MW6 were tested using EPA <br /> method 8240 and were below detection limits for these compounds, <br /> see Update Status Report 21, September, 1993 . Water samples <br /> obtained on March 4, 1994 from MW1, MW6, MW9 and MW11 were tested <br /> using EPA Method 8010 and were below detection limits for these <br /> compounds . Water and vapor samples obtained from MW1, MW6 and <br /> MW9 on April 19, 1995, were tested using EPA Metod 8260 . All <br /> PAGE 3 R603 UPDATE-45 11/07/96 <br />