My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0006405
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
6425
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0519189
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0006405
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2019 4:58:14 PM
Creation date
8/21/2019 2:37:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0006405
RECORD_ID
PR0519189
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0014347
FACILITY_NAME
CURRENTLY VACANT
STREET_NUMBER
6425
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
APN
09741031
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
6425 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
239
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUESTS FOR CLOSURE 2 1 MARCH 1994 <br /> CLOSURE DOCUMENTATION <br /> The minimum information required in the closure report includes: <br /> 1. Distance to production wells for municipal, domestic, agriculture, <br /> industry and other uses within 2000 feet of the site, <br /> 2. Site maps, to scale, of area impactedshowinglocations of former <br /> and existing tank systems, elevation contours, gradients, and <br /> nearby surface waters, buildings, streets, and subsurface utilities, <br /> I High and low ground water levels (below ground surface), <br /> 4. Tabulated results of all sampling and analyses, <br /> 5. Vertical and lateral concentration contours of contaminants found <br /> initially, and those remaining in soil and ground water, both on <br /> and off site, <br /> 6. Mass balance calculation of the substance treated versus that <br /> remaining, <br /> 7. Technoloax;used to clean the site; if Best Available Technology <br /> (BAT) was not used, explain why, <br /> 8. Zone of influence calculated for the subsurface remediation system <br /> and the zone of capture attained for the soil and ground water <br /> remediation system, `�..K <br /> 9. Reasons why "background" was/is unattainable using BAT, and <br /> 10. Rationale why conditions remaining at the site will not adversely <br /> impact water quality, health, or other beneficial uses. <br /> Additional information submitted, such as risk assessments or fate and transport <br /> modeling, must include the assumptions used. <br /> Upon review, if Board staff determines that the Closure Report substantiates the <br /> request for closure, the remedial and monitoring activities may cease. Upon <br /> concurring with the closure request, Board staff will prepare a letter which <br /> summarizes the site conditions and includes the following: <br /> "Based on the information provided, Board staff has determined [and <br /> the Local Implenienting Agency concurs,] that appropriate response <br /> actions have been completed, that acceptable remedial practices were <br /> implemented, and that, at this time, no further investigation, remedial <br /> -- or removal action, or monitoring is required at [Facility name and <br /> address]• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.