My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0006464
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
6425
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0519189
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0006464
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2019 5:03:23 PM
Creation date
8/21/2019 2:50:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0006464
RECORD_ID
PR0519189
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0014347
FACILITY_NAME
CURRENTLY VACANT
STREET_NUMBER
6425
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
APN
09741031
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
6425 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
f <br /> Case Closure Summary <br /> Leaking Underground Fuel Storage Tank Program <br /> Wickland Oil #603, 6425 Pacific Ave , Stockton <br /> VII Additional Comments, Data, etc <br /> Single-walled, first set of USTS removed in 1988 Upgraded dual-walled fiberglass UST's installed since and remain <br /> in place now Site undergoing reconstruction for new tenant to begin gas station operation with existing USTs <br /> (July 2001 update New fiberglass USTS now installed due to existing USTS failure to hold pressure) PHS-EHD <br /> approved-March 2000 soil over-excavation at dispenser areas and Engineered backfill all done after latest Request <br /> for Closure submitted on Feb 16, 2000 Separate report details the dispenser over-excavations and the successful <br /> removal of impacted soils, with NO petroleum impacted soil remaining to place Canopy taken down in May 2000 <br /> and site undergoing plan approval by PHS-EHD for restart of gas station with existing USTS, new <br /> islands/dispensers, and canopy, and new tenant <br /> Jul 17 2001 Update <br /> In response to the CVRWQCB's "NON-CURRENCE TO NFA" LETTER dated 17 July 2000, further investigation to <br /> the east was required A work plan dated February 2, 2001 was submitted by "WEGE" on March 13,2001 PHS- <br /> EHD approved the proposal for additional borings on March 19, 2001 The additional borings "SB-8, 9, & 10", CPT <br /> #1 & CPT#2 were installed under permit on April 26, 2001 "WEGEs" report of findings for this phase dated May <br /> 30, 20C <br /> 0, 2001 was submitted to PHS-EHD and the CVRWQCB on June 8, 2001 The conclusions contained in the report <br /> were evaluated and approved by Marty Hartzell and discussed with PHS-EHD at the June 20, 2001 LOP/CVRWQCB <br /> meeting CVRWQCB asked for a re-submittal of the "REQUEST FOR CLOSURE CONCURRENCE" papers <br /> "Groundwater data from this phase were from "SB-8" only Although groundwater samples were collected from <br /> SB-9 and "SB-10", they were held in case SB-9 got significant hits and further delineation was required Based <br /> on feedback from the CVRWQCB, groundwater samples from "SB-9 & 10" were not analyzed <br /> "A"Zone <br /> The samples from "SB-8" confirmed that TPH-g and Benzene were not detected from discrete depths of 48' to 52' <br /> bgs ("A"zone top) and 84' to 88' bgs ("A"zone bottom) MtBE was detected in the "A" top zone groundwater <br /> samples at 18 µg11 and in the "A" zone bottom at 1 2µg11 <br /> "B"Zone <br /> Groundwater samples from "SB-8" collected from 94' to 98' bgs ("B"zone top) and 116' to 120' bgs ("B"zone <br /> bottom) TPH-g, Benzene, and MtBE were non-detect <br /> DIPE, TAME, ETBE, and TBA analyzed by EPA Method 8260 and non-detect in groundwater samples from "SB-8" <br /> WEGE concluded that the groundwater petroleum plume was vertically defined and the laterally defined in the "B" <br /> zone The lateral "A"zone MtBE detected in "SB-8"was "close to this (California Public Health-13,ug/1) goal and <br /> will continue to degrade with time " On behalf of Wickland Oil Company,WEGE concluded "no further action is <br /> necessary and all wells associated with this site should be destroyed" <br /> end of summary _j I <br /> Case Closure Summary Page 3 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.