Laserfiche WebLink
R603 UPDATE-11 11/19/92 <br /> 4. 0 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> As stated in earlier reports, the soil is contaminated with <br /> gasoline range hydrocarbons beneath the tank field (MW10 ) and <br /> along the capillary fringe of the ground water, (MW1, MW2, MW3 and <br /> MW10) , see Figure 6 . Ground water beneath the site contains the <br /> dissolved constituents of gasoline range hydrocarbons and has <br /> spread out from beneath the site to the north (MW-6 ) , to the south <br /> (MW-7 ) to the west (MW-9 ) and to the east (MW-8 ) . The latest <br /> ground water sampling, September 22 , 1992 , has shown a decline in <br /> the lateral extent of the plume, see Figure 5 ( 9-22-92 ) . <br /> Vapor extraction commenced on October 17, 1991 and up until <br /> November 17 , 1992 has operated for 5388 hours out of a possible <br /> 8821. 5 for a 61% run time, destroying 39 , 542 pounds of gasoline <br /> range hydrocarbons. Since the last status report, October 16 , <br /> 1992, a total of 5176 pounds of gasoline range hydrocarbons have <br /> been removed/destroyed in 524 hours of operation ( 9 . 88 pounds per <br /> hour or 237 pounds per day of operation) . DCE, TCE and PCE <br /> screening indicates that these compounds are not present an the <br /> vapor stream at this site. <br /> . Ground water elevation measurements show that the ground water is <br /> still in a discharge cycle with a valley forming from MW10 towards <br /> MW1 , whale the overall flow direction is to the southeast from the <br /> tank area towards newly installed monitoring well MW12 . <br /> Ground water sample results obtained on December 17 , 1991, <br /> approximately 1473 hours after commencement of vapor extraction, <br /> compared to the ground water sample results obtained on September <br /> 22, 1992, 7486 hours after commencement of vapor extraction, show <br /> a decline an the extent of the dissolved constituents an all of <br /> the monitoring wells except MW3 and MW10 . These wells have <br /> floating product, see Table 1 . <br /> It is felt that once the air dilute has been completely closed and <br /> all vacuum recovery can be directed to MW1, MW2 , MW3 , MW10 and EX-- <br /> 4" , an increase in the vacuum influence will be obtained and a <br /> more substantial reduction in the contaminants, found an the other <br /> ,,ells, Si7a11 be noted. <br /> The permit to dump treated ground water to the sewer has been <br /> received and once the ground water recovery - treatment system has <br /> been completed, pumping will occur from monitor wells MW1 and MW3 . <br /> Non 4er l.11lel.l rGs111 Ls S llOw 411aL pulling fresh air across 1.i:c iFluidt <br /> air interface within the Convault (tank) strips the hydrocarbons <br /> from the water that are presently stored an the tank. The <br /> increased active air spargeang that will occur an the tank should <br /> greatly reduce contaminant levels of the water that will be pumped <br /> PAGE 9 <br />