Laserfiche WebLink
Figure 4 , represents the measurements obtained on December 12, <br /> 1994 Ground water gradient shows a relatively flat flow to the <br /> east, with a high mound at MW3 (probable a residual high in <br /> ground water caused from the vapor extraction at this well) <br /> MW-8 SOURCE TEST <br /> On October 28 , 1994 , a bio-venting source test was performed on <br /> MW-8 The purpose of this test was to evaluate the benefit of <br /> performing a once a week evacuation of the well to enhance oxygen <br /> transfer and remove residual CO2 Mr Mark Schonhoff of San <br /> Joaquin Valley Unified Aar Pollution Control District , is <br /> currently evaluating this source test as it pertains to air <br /> quality conditions in the Stockton area <br /> Presently the vapor extraction system at Former Regal Station <br /> 603 , PTO # N-1090-1-0, is having only limited effect on the <br /> leading edge of the dissolved gasoline range plume that has <br /> traveled east from the site, across Pacific Avenue Two sources <br /> tests, of two hours each, were conducted on MW8 The well is <br /> near the leading edge of the plume and results indicate that a <br /> two hour vacuum extraction once a week will help control the <br /> migration of the plume and will enhance biodegradation by <br /> removing CO2 while limiting hydrocarbon removal to less than 0 1 <br /> pound per week <br /> We are proposing to utilize LTT vacuum trucks to pull an <br /> estimated 11 feet of water vacuum on MW8, for two hours once a <br /> week and exhaust directly to atmosphere This vacuum will <br /> generate a flow rate of approximately 20 cfm <br /> WEGE is also evaluating the need to change out BACT from Thermal <br /> Oxidation to Carbon Adsorbtion, in light of the lower amount of <br /> hydrocarbons found in the vapor stream and the cost savings of <br /> utilities, versus carbon change out <br /> SUMMARY <br /> There has been no evidence of floating product or product sheen <br /> on the ground water in MW1 since April 14 , 1992 and MW3 and MW10 <br /> since November 11, 1992 The last evidence of product , as a <br /> sheen in the condensate recovery system, was on March 1 , 1993 <br /> Vapor recovery has reduced the hydrocarbons in ground water <br /> significantly since the May 25, 1990 sampling, see Table 1 . <br /> Using benzene as an indicator, monitoring wells MWI , MW4 MW5, <br /> MW6, MW7 and MW9 have been reduced to below detection limits <br /> while the wells being utilized for vapor extraction (MW2, MW3 , <br /> and MW10) have been reduced by better than 95%, 99a and 99% <br /> respectively MWS increased from a reduced of approximately 56% <br /> (June-September, 1994) to a 220-. reduction as shown from the <br /> December 12 , 1994 sampling, this increase in contamination is <br /> most likely due to the down time of the REMOX unit during the <br /> months of October and November, 1994 Of the newly installed <br /> wells MW11 and MW12 , MW12 has shown a significant (92t) reduction <br /> PAGE 2 R603 UPDATE-35 1/17/95 <br />