My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0006581
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
6425
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0519189
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0006581
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2019 3:58:13 PM
Creation date
8/21/2019 3:14:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0006581
RECORD_ID
PR0519189
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0014347
FACILITY_NAME
CURRENTLY VACANT
STREET_NUMBER
6425
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
APN
09741031
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
6425 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
R603 UPDATE-28 5/24/94 <br /> GROUND WATER QUARTERLY SAMPLING <br /> Ground water samples were collected on March 4 and 29, 1994 see <br /> Table 1 These samples were collected by a WEGE Geo--technician <br /> and "Chain of Custody" delivered on ice to State certified <br /> testing laboratorys (SUPERIOR PRECISION ANALYTICAL, INC. DHS <br /> #1332 and AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK, INC. DHS #1172) for <br /> chemical analyses . The March 2, 1994 samples were analyzed for <br /> Halogenated Volatile Organics using EPA Method 8010 . The <br /> compounds of interest are associated with the Lincoln. Village <br /> ground water plume (Dichloroethane (DCE) - Specific Gravity of <br /> 1 . 18 and solubility of 0 . 6%r, Trichloroethylene (TCE) - Specific <br /> Gravity of 1 46 and solubility of 0 . 1%- and Tetrachloroethylene <br /> (Perk) - Specific Gravity of 1 , 62 and solubility of 0 . 02k . To <br /> obtain representative sample the bailers were weighted so as to <br /> sink them to the bottom of the shallow ground water wells to <br /> obtain the samples from the bottom of the well versus the top of <br /> the ground water in the well, as is done for gasoline range <br /> hydrocarbons - specific gravity 0 . 64 The March 29, 1994 samples <br /> were analyzed for TPH and BTEX concentrations using EPA Methods <br /> 8015 and 602 respectively Since diesel has never shown up in <br /> the sample results, the samples obtained on 11/27/90 and later <br /> were analyzed using EPA methods 5030 and 602 for Total Fuel <br /> Hydrocarbons and BTEX The next quarterly sampling will occur in <br /> June, 1994 <br /> 3 . 0 RESULTS <br /> GROUND WATER SAMPLE RESULTS <br /> Ground water samples were collected from monitor wells MW1, MW6 , <br /> MW9 and MW11 on March 4 , 1994 These wells are situated between <br /> the Lincoln Village ground water problem (ground water <br /> contaminated with DCE, PCE & TCE) and the active ground water <br /> remediation at this site The water samples collected were chain <br /> of custody delivered to Superior Precision Analytical, Inc. for <br /> analysis using EPA method 8010 - Halogenated Volatile Organic <br /> Compounds . Laboratory results show below detection limits for <br /> all compounds tested, see Appendix A and Table 1 <br /> Ground water samples were obtained from all of the monitoring <br /> wells on March 29, 1994 for analysis of total petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg) and BTEX. <br /> the latest sample results showed a decline in contaminant levels <br /> associated with the ground water at MW1, MW2, and MW12 . Monitor <br /> wells MW4 , MW5, MW6, MW7, MW9 and MW11 continue to be below <br /> detection limits The other wells that have some degree of <br /> ground water contamination (MW3 , MW8 , and MW10) showed increases, <br /> see Table 1, and Figure S . <br /> The increase in contaminant concentrations found at MW3 , and MW10 <br /> is thought to be associated with the increase in vacuum at these <br /> wells, while the increase at MW8 maybe associated with the <br /> drawing back of the plume to the site, see Tables 1 and 3 . <br /> PAGE 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.