Laserfiche WebLink
isopropyl Ether, Ethyl tert-Butyl Ether, Methyl-tert-Butyl Ether, tert-Amyl Methyl Ether and tert- <br /> Butanh using EPA method 8260 modified and for Ethylene Dibromide (1,2-Dibromoethane) and <br /> 1,2-Dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) using EPA method 8260 On February 23, 2000, the product <br /> dispensing piping was exposed and it was determined that this piping would be removed The <br /> piping (double walled fiberglass) was removed and samples were obtained, under the observation <br /> of Mr Michael Kith SJC-EHD One area of release was discovered beneath part of the piping and <br /> that area was later over-excavated, see Pit 3 on Figure 9 During the removal of the double walled <br /> fiberglass product dispensing piping old abandoned steel product dispensing piping, possibly with <br /> vapor return piping was discovered. This piping was inspected, removed and representative soil <br /> samples were obtained, under the observation of Ms. Letitia Briggs SJC-EHD. Sample results <br /> indicated that gasoline range hydrocarbons impacted two areas, see Pit 1 and Pit 2 on Figure 9 <br /> These areas were later over-excavated Over-excavation of all three gasoline tainted areas were <br /> observed by Mr. Michael Infnrna SJC-PHS Approximately 70 cubic yards of gasoline tainted soils <br /> were over-excavated from the three pits This soil was removed for disposal to Forward Landfill <br /> during March 2000. During station upgrade, an additional 600 cubic yards of soil was excavated <br /> Soni samples were obtained from the excavated soil piles under the direction of Mr Michael <br /> Infurna These samples were analyzed using EPA Method 8260 B and were all below LLDL, see <br /> April 6, 2001 report "Sample Results of Excavated Soil Piles", Appendix F <br /> RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Wickland has addressed all the concerns stated in the RWQCB Nonconcurrance letter dated July <br /> 18, 2000 Degradation of TPHg and BTEX has been complete at a distance 345 feet downgradnent <br /> of the site (SB8) No further action is necessary and all wells associated with this site should be <br /> destroyed <br /> IIEWTATIONS <br /> The information presented in this report is based on the following <br /> 1 The observations and data collected by field personnel <br /> 2 The result of laboratory analyzes performed by a state certified analytical laboratory <br /> 3 Our understanding of the regulations of San Joaquin County, the City of Stockton and the <br /> State of California <br /> 4 References reviewed for this report <br /> Changes in groundwater conditions can occur due to variations in rainfall, temperature, local and <br /> regional water use and local construction practices In addition, variations in the soil and <br /> groundwater conditions could exist beyond the points explored in this investigation <br /> State Certified Laboratory analytical results are included in this report. This laboratory follows <br /> EPA and State of California approved procedures, however, WEGE is not responsible for errors in <br /> these laboratory results <br /> s <br /> 7 R-603 May 2001 <br />