Laserfiche WebLink
ggg <br /> V'! . <br /> 3.3 Laboratory Analysis - Groundwater <br /> Laboratory analysis of �groundQiit'ej r7. recorded <br /> concentrations of tbonzene.�at aQ :�Ot billian '(Fpb) in <br /> well T-1. The three other wells did not record BTEX above <br /> the method detection limits as reported. The laboratory data <br /> sheets and chain of custody form are presented in Appendix IV. <br /> 3.4 Wel! Locations <br /> Research of Department of Water Resources records and <br /> _- discussions with the Tracy public works department indicates <br /> there a rip <br /> r <br /> P (Figure 5) . The two closest� .wells were <br /> used for municipal supply but were abandoned in November. 1987 due <br /> to poor yield and sand infiltration. It is reported that a <br /> replacement well is proposed in Lincoln Park, due west of the <br /> High School site. The five active wells , including one municipal <br /> suppler well, are-located in an up groundwater gradient direction <br /> from ;:he project site at distances ,-'-n excess of 1/4 mile. <br /> 4.0 CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> The hydrologic data for the site indicates a shallow groundwater <br /> aquifer is present with a northerly gradient of .20 to .35 <br /> - . percent. The dissolved concentration of benzene in the <br /> dowcigradient Well T-1 (0.907 ppb) is slightly above the 0.70 ppb <br /> action level for drinking water. Although present, the low level <br /> H„ of benzene within well T-1 and the absence of dissolved <br /> hydrocarbon constituents in wells T-2 and T-3 indicate that the <br /> 'Y contamination is relatively limited in, magnitude and .areal <br /> extent. Because of the fine grained nature .of the near surface <br /> sediments, natural groundwater velocities are relatively low; <br /> which acts to limit contaminant spreading. <br /> 4� � ' a't3 iiia°bf sQi l� from around and beneath the former tan,. <br /> y substantially raitigated the existing soil contamination as well <br /> as removing a major source of continuing groundwater <br /> contamination. Since no known active wells are present within a <br /> .1rte ' miYl �dgsy of the site no immediate threat to water <br /> supply exists. Moreover, these wells produce from below loo feet <br /> and are separated from the shallow groundwater zone by a thick <br /> section of low permeability material. <br /> .r Apparently contamination has not spread significantly away from <br /> the tank area, .which may be due to either the lack of enough time <br /> for contaminants to be detected 40-50 feet downgradient <br /> (unlikely) , or alternatively, natural biodegradation processes <br /> are mitigating the problem near-source. In order to confirm this <br /> process and insure that no contaminated water is moving beyond <br /> -� the site e r_gcommer d � .4.uarterly monitoring Rxog=am-ta pix c3=ode -- <br /> - <br /> werlaaf r FTX 'bysPA X02 ' As <br /> part of phis <br /> I�'94�tpt-�rel�.. levels��il.i�berrecordedwanc�r"ttie:�seasonal. 3�ehavior;�.af��s.:, <br /> 7 <br />