My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0009818
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
ELEVENTH
>
515
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544792
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0009818
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 10:19:00 AM
Creation date
9/3/2019 12:00:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0009818
RECORD_ID
PR0544792
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0004849
FACILITY_NAME
BILLS BAIT & BEACON GAS
STREET_NUMBER
515
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
ELEVENTH
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
515 W ELEVENTH ST
P_LOCATION
03
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' t of the impacted soil remains within the capillary <br /> impacted soil remains at the site Most p l r p ry <br /> fringe or phreatic(saturated) zone. It is likely that groundwater will remain impacted as long <br /> as the impacted soil remains at the site <br /> 5.4 Remediation of Impacted Soil <br /> There are two options for remediation of the remaining petroleum hydrocarbon impacted <br /> soil excavation and in-situ remediation If the remaining impacted soil is excavated, the <br /> overburden soil, approximately 5 feet, would be set aside and used for backfill material This <br /> would allow the removal of most of the remaining impacted soil The impacted soil would <br />' then be removed and disposed The limits of excavation would be constricted by the <br /> property boundaries to the north and west, and the building to the east Monitonng well <br /> MW-1 would be destroyed in this process This well would have to be replaced The <br />' excavation should also be dewatered at least once (preferable twice), therefore facilitating <br /> groundwater remediation This would also reduce overall dissolved phase petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons in the groundwater <br />' <br /> Options for in-situ remediation of soil include vapor extraction/air s ar iii and <br /> P P P g g <br />' bioremediation Additional wells, some located off-site to the west, would need to be <br /> installed for either of these alternatives Soil at this site has a high clay content, which would <br /> make vapor extraction difficult Vapor extraction is not efficient in the remediation of diesel <br /> range compounds However, gasoline range compounds are prominent at this site Air <br /> sparging/vapor extraction would help in the remediation of groundwater In-situ <br /> bioremediation is capable of remediation of both diesel and gasoline range compounds in <br />' soil and water <br /> Excavation and disposal of impacted soil could likely be completed within 30 to 60 days of <br />' removal of the impacted soil, in-situ methods of remediation routinely requires between 6 <br /> months and two year treatment periods <br />' Depending upon the specific method, costs of in-situ treatment for a site of this size can <br /> range from $50,000 to $100,000 Excavation and disposal of approximately 400 cubic yards <br /> of impacted soil, based upon previous costs at the site, could range from $35,000 to $60,000, <br />' including backfill material Additionally, MW-1 would have to be replaced However, until <br /> the exact volume and concentration of impacted soil is known, these costs could vary greatly <br /> IIf the current occupant at the site is not opposed to the disturbance created by excavation, <br /> we recommend excavation and disposal of the impacted soil However, if excavation of the <br /> impacted soil will impair operations, we recommend that a vapor extraction test be initiated <br />' to determine the viability of vapor extraction at the site <br /> o..lnral And.S C i.c. <br /> QRJ"9VMI S I 1 <br /> r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.