Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> INTRODUCTION <br />' In accordance with a request from Mr. William Stewart, Geological <br /> Audit Services, Inc. (GeoAudit) has performed quarterly monitoring <br /> procedures at 515 West Eleventh Street In Tracy, California (the <br />' site) . The proaect background, procedures, findings and conclusions <br /> are presented in the following sections. The site location is <br /> presented 1n Figure 1. A plan of the site is presented in Figure 2 . <br />' BACKGROUND <br />' The site is located in a relatively flat business and residential <br /> area of Tracy, California (Figure 1 - Location Map) . The site was <br /> formerly a Beacon Gasoline Station. <br />' Three underground storage tanks were removed from the site in 1988 . <br /> Hydrocarbon contamination was discovered in the soil and <br /> groundwater following the tank removal. Subsequent assessment <br />' activities included the installation of three on-site groundwater <br /> monitoring wells 1n June 1988 (Figure 2 - Site Plan) . <br /> M A passive monitoring program was conducted between the second <br /> quarter of 1990 and the first quarter of 1991. During the <br /> monitoring program, contamination levels showed considerable <br /> fluctuation. Based on information from the existing assessment/ <br />' monitoring reports, the depth to ground water is approximately 8 to <br /> 12 feet with the gradient directed to the north or northwest. <br /> Contamination is directed primarily to the north. <br />' PROCEDURES <br />' On 24 February 1993, representatives from Geological Audit <br /> Services, Inc. visited the site. Depth to groundwater was measured <br /> for each well. An oily substance was observed in monitoring well #1 <br />' (MW #1) during bailing, and 1t was determined that an interface <br /> meter should be obtained to determine the thickness of this layer. <br />' Geological Audit returned to the site on 5 March 1993 . An interface <br /> meter was used to determine the thickness of the substance in MW <br /> #1, and the depth to water in each well was measured relative to <br /> the top of the casing. The oily substance in MW #1 was found to be <br />' a film, and not significant for depth to groundwater measurements. <br /> The hydraulic gradient and flow direction were determined from this <br /> data (see Table 1 below) . <br /> After water levels were measured, a three-stage submersible purge <br /> pump was used to purge the standing water from each well. <br /> Approximately 8 to 10 gallons of water were removed from each well <br /> to stabilize temperature, pH and conductivity (Table 2) . The water <br /> was placed in DOT approved 55-gallon drums and stored on-site. <br /> Water samples were then collected using disposable plastic bailers. <br />