Laserfiche WebLink
' Cox and Cox . ~ <br /> Claim No. 9444 -3 March 24,2009 <br /> B. 1n-Situ Soil/Groundwater Remediation: none identified <br /> li <br /> D. Groundwater Trends: <br /> • Benzene trends are shown below: <br /> 'BENZENE Results for MVV 9 <br /> iaoo r <br /> 1zoo; <br /> I <br /> I <br /> soo <br /> aoo <br /> zoo <br /> --� <br /> I ' <br /> I <br /> VII. SENSITIVE RECEPTOR SURVEY: no wells identified within '/2 mile of the site <br /> VIII. COMMENTS AND-JUSTIFICATION FOR RECOMMENDED ACTION <br /> A. Site Description: maintenance facility <br /> B. ,Site History: the extent of groundwater contamination is defined <br /> C. Groundwater Monitoring Summary: strong monitoring history <br /> D. Remediation Summary: none identified <br /> E. Contaminant Exposure Pathway Evaluation: unknown <br /> I <br /> F. Recommendation: <br /> In April 2008, the Fund made the following recommendation: Based on the <br /> following criteria, the Fund recommends this site be considered for closure <br /> providing the potential for soil vapor migration is assessed and determined safe <br /> for,'prescribed site activities, public participation and fee title notifications are <br /> conducted, and the monitoring wells are appropriately abandoned. <br /> • The source of the UST release has been identified and removed. <br /> Free-phase product in groundwater has been removed to the full extent <br /> practicable, in accordance with the UST Regulations (Title 23, CCR, <br /> Section 2655). <br /> California Environmental Protection Agency t <br /> pa Recyc%d Paper - <br />