Laserfiche WebLink
E osure Pathways <br /> The petroleum source has been removed and a geophysical survey did not reveal any other <br /> suspected UST locations Groundwater monitoring has shown that the plume has <br /> remained effectively stationary, in a location lust east of the traders in the driveway <br /> roughly bounded by the assumed edge location of the irrigation pipeline Some residual <br /> soil contaminants are interpreted present in the vicinity of the former tank pit, MW-3 and <br /> strata near MW-9 Boring data shows residual contaminants in the capillary fringe and <br /> occasional blebs of separate phase product occurred after the drilling, previous monitoring <br /> • shows that product was not present in most wells, wells NM-3 and MW-9 have displayed <br /> very small amounts of product_ The appearance of the product followed push borings and <br /> flowing conditions near these wells The product appearance is interpreted to be a long- <br /> term release near the wells caused by sediment disturbed by borehole flowing <br /> Possible exposure pathways at the site are by inhalation of indoor and outdoor air, and <br /> ingestion of groundwater Potential receptors could include commercial workers and <br /> trader residents The trailers are founded on stands above the ground surface and not on <br /> the ground surface A groundwater pathway is not considered for this cleanup since <br /> residential water is supplied by the City of Tracy and institutional controls preclude drilling <br /> drinking water wells on-site A one-quarter mile well search did not reveal any active <br /> water well near the site <br /> Site Cleanup Options <br /> PHS-EHD requested that Wright propose three possible cleanup options to address <br /> cleanup approach for these residual contaminants The LIST sources have been removed <br /> in 1992-1993 The geophysical survey in 2001 showed that there were no indications of a <br /> UST remaining in the area investigated On the basis of this data Wright concludes that <br /> there are no other UST's present on the basis of this data, however, there are two areas of <br /> residual soil contaminant sources which can contribute too the dissolved plume The <br /> dissolved groundwater plume has shown varying TPHG and Benzene concentrations, <br /> however, the monitoring data show that the plume is static, that is no net movement from <br /> the area bordered by Wells MW-1, 3 and 9 The edge of the plume is interpreted to <br /> extend to a point lust short of the northern property line, with some seasonal variation <br /> depending upon local ground water conditions <br /> Page 10 <br />