Laserfiche WebLink
contaminants after excavation work is complete Groundwater samples will be collected <br /> from the excavation preceding each dewatering and prior to backfill to ascertain dissolved <br /> contaminants presence Representative samples of the known contaminated soil will be <br /> collected from stockpile(s) that will be stored at property to east with water holding tanks <br /> or at Forward Landfill during characterizations for disposal since space is limited at the <br /> site for stockpiling These representative samples will allow contaminant mass removal <br /> to be estimated by Wright after the interim remediation work is complete <br /> Wright will also obtain additional samples for a bench scale bioremediation feasibility <br /> study if required under the RWD and RAP The samples would be provided to <br /> (Regenisis ORC) for evaluation <br /> As noted above, there are some limitations of using the excavation approach The <br /> presence of the aforementioned utility and dwellings will constrain/limit the ultimate size <br /> of the excavations and the excavation will likely be phased to address the problems <br /> Utilities will have to be temporarily disconnected and relocated, and the excavation will <br /> be limited in the near vicinity of the irrigation pipeline The trailers, water service and <br /> the irrigation pipeline will be a significant limitation in the area around MW-9 Westside <br /> Irrigation District (WSID) indicates the earliest possible time to allow excavation is <br /> several days after the pipeline is shut down and allowed to empty The irrigation water <br /> supply is to be turned off on or about October 31, 2003 The current schedule and the <br /> feasibility of excavation within feet of the pipeline in the summer months when the <br /> pipeline is full is not an option <br /> Wright believes that the removal of the suspected residual sources in the vicinity of MW- <br /> 3 and MW-9, and the area just southwest of MW-3 will remove the residuals that are <br /> interpreted to contribute to the long term presence of TPHG observed in these wells <br /> Given the requirement of site cleanup, this approach is both timely and cost effective in <br /> light of not using the initially selected insitu bioremediation approach <br /> Wright anticipates the following field approaches will occur, and be used during <br /> excavation <br /> • Monitoring wells MW-3 and MW-9 will be closed by pressure grouting prior to <br /> starting the excavation The wells will have to be reinstalled upon completion of <br /> the excavation as close as practicable in undisturbed soil near the excavations <br /> Wright would secure the necessary permits from PHSEHD to close the wells and <br /> construct new wells as described Wright would close the wells, perforin the <br /> excavation and have the wells reinstalled to meet the February 2004 Quarterly <br /> Monitoring for site monitoring Some adjustment may be required depending <br /> upon actual starting date of the excavation work after draining the irrigation line <br /> and weather in early to mid November 2003 <br /> • Excavated soil will be loaded directly into trucks for shipment to the stockpile <br /> Iocation off-site or the landfill since there is not room for surface treatment for <br /> contaminated soil stockpiling <br /> Page 4 <br />