Laserfiche WebLink
2.0 Discussion <br /> Groundwater flow direction is northerly at a flow gradient that is consistent with historically <br /> observed northerly flow trends (see Figure 1) Sinuous groundwater contours present in the <br /> vicmity of MW-3R is attributed to the recent soil excavation and placement of somewhat more <br /> porous fill <br /> TPHG concentrations declined in MW-2, MW-3R and in MW-9R since the fourth quarter 2004 <br /> (see Figures 2 and 3) Benzene concentrations rose slightly in Well MW-2 and decreased slightly <br /> in MW-9R Well MW-4 showed that contaminants were not detected MTBE and related <br /> oxygenates were not detected in any well Separate phase product was not observed in MW-3R <br /> and MW-9R during this sampling event. <br /> Selected combined Time vs Contaminant Graphs, (combined data of MW-3 and MW-3R, and <br /> combined data of MW-9 and MW-9R) were prepared to show overall historic dissolved trends that <br /> are attached to this report Wright has added the data from MW-3R and 9R to the same graphs <br /> since these wells were installed only about 5 feet from the previous locations It is Wright's <br /> opinion that the combining the historic data to the new wells data will enable ease in continued <br /> contaminant trend tracking in the areas of historically most elevated TPHG and Benzene plumes <br /> Soil excavation activities removed residual contaminant in the vadose zone and upper aquifer in the <br /> area around MW-3R and 9R While some residual is known to remain, the dissolved TPHG and <br /> Benzene concentrations have decreased The interpreted location of the dissolved plume based on <br /> the historic groundwater flow and interpreted contour information continues to generally show very <br /> little to no net plume movement beyond the vicinity of Wells MW-3R and MW-9R <br /> 3.0 Conclusions and Recommendations <br /> Groundwater flow direction was northerly under a low calculated gradient and water levels in <br /> monitoring wells had changed slightly since the previous quarter The excavation area near MW- <br /> 3R and MW-9R has somewhat more porosity than the native soil/sediment and may cause some <br /> localized groundwater interpreted contour sinuosity near Well MW-3R In our opinion, the <br /> mapped contaminant dissolved plume continues to occur near the center of the site, similar to <br /> historic site observations and previous investigation reports submitted to SJC/EHD <br /> The TPHG and Benzene levels show a much lower dissolved concentrations in monitoring wells <br /> MW-3R and MW-9R that is attributed to removal of residual contaminant Fluctuations of TPHG <br /> and Benzene may occur from desorption since some residual sources under the large utility <br /> pipelines could not be removed during the soil excavation given the seasonal rise and fall of <br /> groundwater levels <br /> The site is scheduled for continued quarterly monitoring at this time <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br />