Laserfiche WebLink
f6 <br /> F <br /> F <br /> • <br /> Discussion <br /> Groundwater flow du=on is northerly at a flow gradient that is consistent with historically observed northerly <br /> flow trends (see Figure 1) Groundwater levels have declined about 0 5 feet in wells since the last quarter z <br /> Floating product was present in MW-3 (apparent thickness of 0 26 feet) and in MW-9 (apparent thickness of 0 51 <br /> feet) and a total of about 450 mi Miters was bailed and removed Since samples were collected and analyzed from <br /> those wells, the TPHG levels increased in wells MW-6 and MW-9 and decreased in MW-3 Benzene <br /> concentrations declined in Well MW-3 and only increased slightly in MW-9 MTBE oxygenates were not <br /> detected in any well <br /> Contaminant TPHG concentrations increased in MW-3 and MW-9 and a decline in groundwater levels suggesting <br /> a residual TPHG source in those wells vicinity Wells MW-3 and MW-9 have historically shown elevated TPHG <br /> concentrations on the site and observed fluctuations have been interpreted as local contaminant drainage and <br /> desorption from sediment near the casing Separate phase product was observed in MW-3 and MW-9 during this <br /> sampling event and is interpreted to anse from drainage within the capillary fringe and aquifer sediment Previous <br /> site study, including geophysical study for additional potential product sources did not reveal any subsurface <br /> strictures as possible tanks for product sources Previous observations indicate that product presence tends to <br /> diminish when groundwater levels rise during the ram:y months (aquifer recharge), and reappear during dry <br /> months(aquifer discharge) <br /> . The presence of petroleum product in MW-3 and MW-9 has not caused a concurrent large rise in BTEX volatile <br /> content that in our opinion indicates the dissolved plume of degraded fuel is relatively depleted in dissolved volatile <br /> constituents (see Figures 2, 3 and 4) The elevated dissolved data from MW-3 and MW-9 may be m part <br /> attributed to analysis of a water sample collected from a well containing sheen to mucor separate phase product <br /> Previous experience has shown that such a sample will tend to show very high dissolved contaminants due to the <br /> presence of the product in that well <br /> The interpreted location of the dissolved plume based on the historic groundwater flow and interpreted contour <br /> information continues to show essentially no net plume movement beyond the area immediately around Wells <br /> MW-3 and MW-9 <br /> Conclusions and Recommendations <br /> Groundwater flow direction was northerly under a low calculated gradient and water levels in monitoring wells <br /> had declined about 0 50 feet since the previous quarter In our opinion, the mapped contaminant dissolved plume <br /> continues to occur near the center of the site, sunilar to historic site observations and previous mvestigation reports <br /> submitted to FHS EHD Tun layers of separate phase product occurred in MW-3 and MW-9 The TPHG levels <br /> fluctuated in wells, with an increase in MW-3 and MW-9 <br /> Wright has completed and submitted an interim remedial action plan HUP (targeted in the vicinity of MW-3 and <br /> MW-9) subsequent to PHS EHD review of the CAP Wright has discussed the TRAP interim cleanup approach for <br /> submittal for PHS EHD review and scheduling The site is scheduled for continued quarterly monitoring at this <br /> time <br /> Page 3 <br />