Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> Summary of Additional Source Assessment <br /> Modifications of Work Rian 2000-2001 <br /> The PHS-EHD representative and field geologist discussed the sampling as the borehole <br /> drilling, sampling and borehole sealing progressed on April 25, 2000. Field observations <br /> during drilling indicated that contaminants were not widespread at the originally selected <br /> MW-9 and MW-3 locations; hence a modification to the fieldwork and sampling was <br /> approved by PHS-EHD in the field. The modifications included the following; advancing <br /> five boreholes near the originally selected locations, returning to the site at a later date to <br /> mark utilities for borehole drilling and to search for additional possible contaminant <br /> sources both at the original tank pit and elsewhere, and a discussion with PHS-EBD <br /> regarding a review of previous work and the revision of the work plan prior to returning <br /> to the field to continue assessment. Wright met with the PHS-EHD representative in late - <br /> April 2000 and discussed the amended approach to additional plume definition in April <br /> 2001. <br /> • Conducting a surface geophysical survey with ground penetration radar to search for <br /> anomalous indications of possible contaminant sources(discussed above). <br /> • Performing utility location with the City of Tracy and Westside irrigation line owner to <br /> locate lines so that borings can be advanced to collect more lateral and vertical <br /> assessment data near MW-9. <br /> • Inspecting the welding building for indications of potential contaminant sources (such <br /> as oil/water separators and sand traps). None were observed. <br /> • Advancing exploratory borings through the former tank pit and east and south of MW- <br /> 9 for additional vertical and lateral subsurface assessment in those areas(see Figure 2). <br /> Additional field modifications were added during the April 19, 2001 work. This consisted <br /> of moving borehole locations to attempt to delineate the edges of the contaminant plume <br /> based upon drilling field observations. The final borehole locations are presented on <br /> Figure I and presented on our June 6, 2001 report (see References). <br /> Geophysical Survey <br /> Norcal Geophysical performed a surface geophysical on January 16, 2001 in the area of <br /> the former tank pit and in areas suspected of possible tank presence. This work was <br /> suggested by PHS-EHD to rule out possible sources of petroleum hydrocarbons given the <br /> contaminant trends observed at well MW-9. The survey consisted of magnetometer and <br /> ground penetrating radar equipment sweeping the area (see attached report Norcal <br /> report). The magnetometer survey searches for buried metallic objects and ground- <br /> penetrating radar(GPR) uses microwaves to penetrate the subsurface to depths of about 5 <br /> to 10 feet. The responses of buried objects to this equipment indicate possible targets for <br /> additional subsurface study and provides data to evaluate buried objects. <br /> Page 4 <br />