Laserfiche WebLink
' Chemical Analytical Methods and Results <br /> Nine groundwater samples were analyzed using EPA Methods 503018015, 602 and 8260 for Total Petroleum <br /> �J Hydrocarbons as Gasoline (TPHG), Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene and Xylene (BTE <br /> X) and fuel oxygenatesinciuding Methyl-tert-buty1-ether (MTBE), Tert-Butyl Alcohol (TBA), <br /> Di-Isopropyl Ether (RIPE), Ethyl tert-butyl <br /> ether(ETBE),Tert-Amyl Methyl Ether TAME). The analytical results of the groundwater samples for this sampling <br /> event are attached and listed below in Table 1 (and Figures 2, 3 and 4) and historic data is presented in attached <br /> spreadsheet Table 2). <br /> Table 1. Current Quarter Groundwater Chemical Data(April 8,2003) <br /> Sample TPHG Ben Tol Eth 1 X 1 MTBE TBA <br /> D1PE ETBE TAME <br /> u u u u um u I u <br /> u u u <br /> MW-1 ND ND ND ND ND ND <br /> ND ND ND ND <br /> MW-2 2200 4.0 ND M 42 IS ND <br /> ND ND ND ND W-3 19000* 130 1,90 740 2900 ND ND ND <br /> MW-4 ND ND ND ND ND ND <br /> ND ND ND ND ND ND <br /> MW-5 ND ND ND 1.6 4.4 ND ND ND <br /> MW-6 350 ND ND <br /> ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND <br /> MW-7 ND ND 0.77 ND ND ND <br /> MW-8 NDND ND ND ND <br /> ND 3.6 l2 ND ND ND <br /> MW-9 47000# 500 100 2100 6100 ND ND <br /> Blank NDND ND ND <br /> ND ND NI) ND ND ND <br /> ND-None detected u ND - <br /> -micrograms per liter. Ben-Benzene <br /> To]-Toluene Xyl-Xylene <br /> Fuel Ox.-Fuel Oxygenates by Method 8260 from Dec., 1997 forward. Ethyl-Ethylbenzene <br /> 1,2 Dichloroethane and Ethylene Dibromide ND in all wells;these analyses discontinued in 2000. <br /> *-0.08 feet of degraded product present on water in well at time of sampling;sampler removed 80 milliliters. <br /> #-0.05 feet of degraded product present on water in well at time of sampling;sampler removed 30 milliliters. <br /> F <br /> Discussion 1 <br /> 1 <br /> P <br /> Groundwater pow direction is northerly at a pow gradient that is consistent with historically observed trends (see <br /> Figure 11. Groundwater levels have declined slightly in wells since the last quarter. TPHG levels decreased in <br /> wells MW-3 and MW-9. Benzene concentrations declined in Well MW-3 and only increased slightly in MW-9. <br /> Floating product was present in MW-3 (apparent 0.08 feet) and in MW-9 (apparent 0.05 feet) and a total of about <br /> 120 milliliters was removed. MTBE and fuel oxygenates were not detected in any well <br /> a , i <br /> a Contaminant TPHG concentrations decreased in MW-3 and MW-9 compared to the first quarter. This decrease <br /> appears to follow a decline in groundwater levels suggesting a residual source in the wells vicinity. Wells MW-3 fl <br /> i and MW-9 have historically shown elevated concentrations on the site and observed fluctuations have been $ <br /> s <br /> interpreted as local contaminant desorption from sediment near the casing. Separate phase product was observed in <br /> MW-3 and MW-9 during this sampling and the increase in TPHG is attributed to the presence of this degraded <br /> product in the wells and sample collection. However, the presence of product did not cause a large rise in BTEX <br /> i <br /> volatile content which in our opinion indicates a dissolved plume of degraded fuel depleted in dissolved volatile <br /> constituents (see Figures 2, 3 and 4). The interpreted location of the plume continues to remain staric with no net <br /> movement. <br /> 1 <br /> Page 2 �' <br />