Laserfiche WebLink
• Field Methods <br /> Geophysical Survey <br /> Norcal Geophysical performed a surface geophysical on January 16, 2001 in the area of <br /> the former tank pit and in areas suspected of possible tank presence This work was <br /> suggested by PHS-EHD to rule out possible sources of petroleum hydrocarbons given the <br /> contaminant trends observed at well MW-9 The survey consisted of magnetometer and <br /> ground penetrating radar equipment sweeping the area (see attached report Norcal <br /> report) The magnetometer survey searches for buned metallic objects and ground- <br /> penetrating radar (GPR) uses microwaves to penetrate the subsurface to depths of about 5 <br /> to 10 feet The responses of buned objects to this equipment indicate possible targets for <br /> additional subsurface study and provides data to evaluate buned objects <br /> The results'of the survey showed that some metal debns and utilities were detected <br /> however, no UST was located A possible fill port was noted in front of the large building <br /> (former garage), however that screw cap did not appear to have been a fill port and no <br /> vent pipes were traced to that location, no hard evidence of a UST was noted (see Norcal <br /> report, page 2) GPR data indicated small metallic debris near the welding building but it <br /> did not represent an object such as a drum or UST The suspected vent line was traced to <br /> the east (toward the former tank pit) with a termination about 55 feet east of the building <br /> • A suspected water line was also noted, and the large imgation line was not observed, <br /> possibly indicative of a clay pipe or nonmetallic pipe construction <br /> Exploratory Borings <br /> Twelve exploratory bonngs were drilled at the site (Figure 1) on Apnl 25, 2000 and Apnl <br /> 19, 2001 Drilling permits were secured from PHS-EHD, and all utilities were cleared <br /> pnor to doing the fieldwork Representatives of the Westside Irrgation Distnct and City <br /> of Tracy met Wright in the field and directed where boreholes should be placed On the <br /> day of drilling, the City of Tracy requested that due to the presence of two large sewer <br /> lines, not to dell any bonngs tentatively scheduled in that vicinity The direct push bonngs <br /> were advanced at the available locations in the unpaved areas shown on Figure 1 <br /> The bonngs were dnlled into the uppermost aquifer strata to the contact of, and into the <br /> underlying confining strata field working agwtard (referred to as the aquitaard strata in <br /> previous reports, strata which are used to terminate bonngs as a conservative measure to <br /> prevent puncturing possible clayey beds and allowing vertical leakage, the term aquitard <br /> implies a leaky strata) Moderate to severe flowing conditions were encountered in some <br /> boreholes, which required dnlling methods to be alternated between push and auger <br /> dnlhng depending upon the seventy of the flowing conditions Severe flowing borehole <br /> conditions were encountered locally, some soil and groundwater samples could not be <br /> collected, and the driller halted the borehole advance <br /> Page 3 <br />